LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 755.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i6.1486
Supporting municipalities in implementing participatory
development initiatives: lessons learned from a decade of
Poverty Stoplight implementations
Apoyo a los municipios en la implementación de iniciativas de desarrollo
participativo: Lecciones aprendidas de una década de implementación del
Semáforo de Eliminación de Pobreza
Marie Claire Burt
mcburt@colmena.com.py
Investigadora independiente
Asunción – Paraguay
Karuna Parwani
kparwani@colmena.com.py
Investigadora independiente
Barcelona – España
Nancy Ramos
nrramos@fundacionparaguaya.com.py
Fundación Paraguaya (Poverty Stoplight)
Asunción – Paraguay
Victoria Peroni
vperoni@fundacionparaguaya.org.py
Fundación Paraguaya (Poverty Stoplight)
Asunción – Paraguay
Juan Carlos Pane
jcpane@colmena.com.py
Investigador independiente
Asunción – Paraguay
Martin Burt
burt@fundacionparaguaya.org.py
Fundación Paraguaya (Poverty Stoplight)
Asunción – Paraguay
Artículo recibido: 29 de noviembre de 2023. Aceptado para publicación: 15 de diciembre de 2023.
Conflictos de Interés: Algunos de los autores trabajan para el Semáforo de Eliminación de la Pobreza (Poverty
Stoplight).
Abstract
Participatory initiatives in local governance, such as participatory budgeting and local assemblies, aim
to involve communities at various levels of a development project. A key challenge remains in
equipping government officials with tools to effectively understand and address community needs.
This paper examines the efficacy of the Poverty Stoplight (Stoplight or PS), a participatory tool, in
addressing this gap. This tool enables communities to self-assess their poverty status, identifying
themselves as "red", "yellow", or "green" based on a range of indicators. Emphasizing self-assessment
and mentoring, the Stoplight approach fosters community ownership and agency. This ensures
members play a pivotal role in highlighting their needs and forming their development aspirations. This
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 756.
research adopts a case study approach, detailing experiences with the Poverty Stoplight across
diverse contexts, such as in Paraguay and Ecuador. Results indicate that the Stoplight not only
facilitates individual poverty elimination strategies but also promotes collective participation within
local governmental structures.
Keywords: participatory development, poverty stoplight, local governance, self-assessment,
empowerment
Resumen
Las iniciativas participativas en la gobernanza local, como los presupuestos participativos y las
asambleas locales, pretenden implicar a las comunidades en los distintos niveles de un proyecto de
desarrollo. Uno de los principales retos sigue siendo dotar a los funcionarios de herramientas que les
permitan comprender y abordar eficazmente las necesidades de la comunidad. Este artículo examina
la eficacia del Semáforo de Eliminación de la Pobreza, una herramienta participativa, para subsanar
esta carencia. Esta herramienta permite a las comunidades autoevaluar su situación de pobreza,
identificándose como "roja", "amarilla" o "verde" en función de una serie de indicadores. Al hacer
hincapié en la autoevaluación y la mentoría, el enfoque del Semáforo de la Pobreza fomenta la
apropiación y la agencia de la comunidad. Esto garantiza que los miembros desempeñen un papel
clave a la hora de poner de relieve sus necesidades y dar forma a sus aspiraciones de desarrollo. Esta
investigación adopta un enfoque de estudio de casos, detallando las experiencias con el Semáforo de
la Pobreza en diversos contextos, como en Paraguay y Ecuador. Los resultados indican que el
Semáforo de la Pobreza no sólo facilita las estrategias individuales de eliminación de la pobreza, sino
que también promueve la participación colectiva dentro de las estructuras de gobierno local.
Palabras clave: desarrollo participativo, semáforo de pobreza, gobernanza local,
autoevaluación, empoderamiento
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades,
publicados en este sitio está disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons .
Como citar: Burt, M. C., Parwani, K., Ramos, N., Peroni, V., Pane, J. C., & Burt, M. (2023). Supporting
municipalities in implementing participatory development initiatives: lessons learned from a decade
of Poverty Stoplight implementations. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y
Humanidades 4(6), 755– 770. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i6.1486
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 757.
INTRODUCTION
The advancement of economic and social well-being in communities requires a strategic and multi-
layered approach. One central element in this complex landscape is the enhancement of local social
dialogue and managerial skills among both governmental and civil society stakeholders. Fostering such
capacities is vital for the effective design and implementation of community development initiatives
(ILO, 2013). While progress has been made in understanding the importance of participatory
governance (Chambers, 1994; Jennings, 2000; Camfield and McGregor, 2005; Camfield, 2006; Reason
and Bradbury, 2008; Roelen et al., 2020), a nuanced understanding of the dynamics between citizen
participation and administrative decision-making remains limited.
The concept of participatory development has gained considerable traction over the years, offering
transformative possibilities across various sectors. Scholars and practitioners have explored numerous
aspects of this paradigm, from participatory budgeting to local assemblies (Pomeranz, 2014; Shannon
and O’Leary, 2020). However, there remains an explicit gap in understanding the depth and nature of
citizen participation within the structure of local governance. Existing models, such as Arnstein’s (1996)
"ladder of participation," Pretty et al., (1995) “the typology of participation” and Cornwall’s (2008) “model
of inclusive participation”, provide limited insight into the fluid, reciprocal interactions that characterize
the relationship between communities and their government counterparts.
To address these shortcomings, this article delves into the symbiosis between participatory
development and local governance. At the heart of this intersection lies the concept of empowerment,
a multifaceted notion intrinsic to participatory development, shaped by diverse interpretations of power
dynamics (Institute of Development Studies, 2011). Empowerment involves creating spaces for
envisioning alternative realities and dismantling existing power structures to realize these visions
(Eyben, Kabeer, and Cornwall, 2008). This dynamic interplay of power is vital in development initiatives,
serving as a driving force for change and transformation. This duo - participatory development and local
governance - offers a lens to better comprehend community-led advancement, emphasizing the
significance of individuals' freedoms and capabilities in shaping meaningful development trajectories.
Such a perspective not only aligns with participatory development’s ethos, which advocates for
community and individual empowerment, but also complements local governance’s objectives to
engage communities in their own future-building endeavors. The potential of participatory development
initiatives to stimulate positive transformations within marginalized communities (Duvendak and
Mader, 2020; Duflo, 2012; Pomeranz, 2014) and the underlying belief in the power of participatory
approaches to empower individuals and alleviate poverty (Pomeranz, 2014; World Bank, 2014) are
testament to this synergy.
This paper seeks to explore the Poverty Stoplight, a participatory tool and methodology designed for
individuals to assess and address their own poverty-related challenges (Ramos and Hammler, 2021).
Central to this approach is the "Life Map," a comprehensive self-assessment similar to a survey, which
utilizes a stoplight color system—red, yellow, and green—to illustrate various indicators of poverty. This
visual representation not only highlights the areas of need (reds and yellows) but also identifies the
priority areas that families choose to focus on for improvement. Developed with the immediate aim of
fostering personal agency and dignity, the Poverty Stoplight also aspires to achieve broader objectives.
These include community transformation and the cultivation of strong civil societies capable of holding
governments accountable. An individual whose basic needs have not been met cannot properly
participate in civil society, and a community, lacking cohesion or information about its own needs on
the ground, cannot adequately lobby for change or enforce accountability. The Poverty Stoplight helps
individuals rise above poverty, fostering empowerment that extends from individuals to communities.
This collective empowerment enables communities to drive policy and societal changes. The Poverty
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 758.
Stoplight thus creates a feedback loop that informs and empowers both individuals and communities
and equips them with the necessary tools to demand change from those in office.
In addition, the Poverty Stoplight provides local governments with a more nuanced understanding of
the community’s challenges, allowing them to optimize their efforts to protect individual rights and
promote equal opportunity for all to prosper. In this way, local governments can better allocate their
resources and enhance transparency and accountability for their actions.
Our research employs a case study approach, examining its implementation across three different
contexts: a community development project in Paraguay, agricultural programs in Ecuador, and
capacity-building initiatives for civil servants in Paraguay. The case study methodology was chosen for
its capability to capture the multidimensionality and contextual factors affecting participatory
development, thereby contributing a nuanced understanding to the field.
Despite the theoretical convergence of participatory development and local governance, the existing
literature on empirical evaluations of their joint efficacy is scarce. The Poverty Stoplight's application
in our selected case studies offers a practical perspective on this intersection, allowing for the
assessment of how it can influence and shape participatory initiatives and governance processes.
Acknowledging the noted challenges and limitations in citizen engagement and empowerment
(Zimmerman, 2000), this paper seeks to bridge the gap between theoretical constructs and tangible
application, exploring how such approaches can manifest in transformative development practices.
Through our findings, we emphasize the necessity of creating a synergistic relationship between
diverse societal actors, which serves as a catalyst for impactful and enduring community development.
Conceptual Framework
Bhaskar (2008) articulates empowerment as a process that enhances the capacity of disadvantaged
individuals to challenge and alter existing subordinate power relationships. This process is inherently
political, social, and economic in nature (Batliwala, 2007). In the realm of development initiatives,
empowerment serves as a catalyst for change and transformation. However, while many definitions of
empowerment emphasize its processual aspect, development interventions often treat it as an
outcome (Cornwall, 2016; Kabeer, 2018; Priya et al., 2021). This research examines how participatory
development initiatives can stimulate this empowerment process, especially within marginalized
communities (Duvendak and Mader, 2020; Duflo, 2012; Pomeranz, 2014), and how these initiatives align
with the broader participatory ethos of enabling individuals to make meaningful choices (Sen, 2001;
Batliwala, 2019). The belief in the transformative power of these approaches continues to drive
substantial interest and engagement in the development sector (Pomeranz, 2014; World Bank, 2014;
Gessese, 2020).
In participatory development discourse, power is a multidimensional concept that shapes agency,
engagement, and the potential for transformation. "Power to," as highlighted by scholars including Sen
(2001), Clark et al., (2019), Rowlands (1997), and Ibrahim and Alkire (2007), is an individual's capacity
to effect change and pursue valued goals, positioning individuals as architects of their own and their
environment's transformation. This aligns with agency as defined by Sen (2001) —the freedom to set
one's own goals and act upon them. "Power with" (Rowlands, 1997; Luttrell et al., 2007) complements
the previous term by focusing on collective empowerment and the synergies of collaboration. It goes
beyond individual actions to embrace the strength of group cooperation, recognizing that unified efforts
often yield greater outcomes than solitary ones. This dimension of power is critical in participatory
development, as it fosters cooperation, mutual understanding, and shared objectives, allowing for a
collaborative power dynamic that enhances the collective capacity to overcome common challenges.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 759.
Similarly, "power from within" can be understood as an intrinsic form of empowerment that springs
from self-confidence, dignity, and autonomy. This concept, explored by Rowlands (1997), Mayoux
(1998), and others, suggests that empowerment begins with an internal transformation through self-
reflection, enabling individuals—particularly women—to aspire, challenge norms, and make
autonomous decisions. It is power characterized by the courage to face fears and the realization of
one’s innate strength to push against external pressures. On the other hand, "power over," as discussed
by Gaventa (1982), Lukes (2005), and Alsop (2005), represents a more conflictual form of power, where
authority is used to control or coerce, often leading to actions that serve the powerful at the expense of
others. This coercive power can manipulate actions, shape agendas, and even distort truths to uphold
certain interests, creating a zero-sum dynamic in power relations (Pane, 2021). Such dynamics are
antithetical to the goals of modern development programs, which seek to reduce inequalities and
promote social justice by empowering individuals and communities. Recognizing the adverse
implications of "power over," which can undermine sustainable development, ethical standards, and
community resilience, development programs are increasingly focused on nurturing "power from
within" and other forms of collaborative and enabling power.
In light of these circumstances, this discourse embarks on an exploration of the multifaceted
dimensions of power in the context of participatory development. By delving into the intricate
connections between "power to," "power with,", "power from within," and “power over”, this research
aims to shed light on their profound implications for individuals' agency and transformative potential
(Batliwala, 2007; Bhaskar, 2008; Pane, 2021).
Crucially, these dimensions of power are interconnected and synergistic. "Power to" gains momentum
through collective collaboration, reinforcing its link to "power with" (Rowlands, 1997). Similarly, an
amplified sense of "power within" often facilitates action by bolstering one's belief in their capability
(Rowlands, 1997; Mercado, 1997; Batliwala, 2019). Scholars argue that understanding the improvement
of various power dynamics in particular social structures requires adopting a wider viewpoint that
extends beyond focusing solely on individual agents. (Chopra, 2019; McGee and Pettit, 2019). In
essence, these dimensions collectively delineate the multifaceted nature of power within participatory
development, highlighting its nuanced and interdependent manifestations.
The different types of power are not isolated entities, but rather synergistic forces that weave to shape
the dynamics of participatory initiatives. As the pursuit of development gains momentum, it becomes
evident that the potency of these types of power transcends mere resource provision, associating with
collective efforts, self-belief, participatory decision-making, equality, and sustainable development. This
interconnected understanding accentuates the need for local governments engaged in participatory
development to consider the intricate interplay of types of power, recognizing their potential to foster
holistic empowerment and sustainable transformation within their communities.
METHODOLOGY
In our examination of the three case studies, we employ a mixed-methods approach to rigorously
investigate the effectiveness of the Poverty Stoplight (PS) methodology in local government-led
participatory development initiatives. This approach combines quantitative measures, utilizing program
data and statistical analysis to assess outcomes and impacts, with qualitative insights drawn from
interviews with project staff deeply involved in PS implementation. Through this comprehensive
approach, we aim to explore how the PS tool empowers families to own their development journey,
breaking down the complexities of poverty into actionable indicators and engaging them in a
collaborative, problem-solving process to prioritize and address their poverty-related challenges.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 760.
The first case study examines the Cerrito Initiative in Paraguay, which demonstrated a significant
reduction in poverty levels among participating families. The second focuses on the integration of the
PS by Ecuador's Ministry of Agriculture to refine resource allocation and foster cross-agency
collaboration, offering insights into the tool's reception and practical challenges. The third case involves
a partnership between Fundación Paraguaya (FP) and local municipalities in Paraguay to
institutionalize PS as a development instrument, highlighting its role in promoting economic inclusivity
and capacity building among local entrepreneurs.
Our research adopts a comprehensive data collection strategy, leveraging primary data from surveys,
interviews, and reflections from stakeholders involved in each case study. This methodical approach
allows for an in-depth evaluation of the Poverty Stoplight (PS) methodology's implementation
specifics—such as the extent of its adoption across cities, participant demographics, responsible
government agencies, and direct beneficiaries. Furthermore, by examining the dynamic interplay
between local communities and governments, our study elucidates the collaborative processes and
leadership mechanisms that underpin these participatory development efforts.
Lastly, our research aims to distil essential insights into the functioning of participatory development
as a whole. We seek to identify and highlight the most successful participatory elements that have
contributed to the overall effectiveness of these initiatives. By examining these key dimensions in each
case study, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential and challenges of
participatory development in the context of local governance.
RESULTS
In this section, we present the main results from the three case studies exploring how the Poverty
Stoplight provides local governments with bottom-up data and a methodology to foster participation
between communities and governments to improve the quality of life of citizens.
Case Study 1: Poverty Stoplight Implementation in the Cerrito community
The Stoplight-Cerrito initiative study exemplifies a partnership between local government and
community, unified by the Poverty Stoplight initiative. In 2017, Fundación Paraguaya started working
closely with 900 families in Cerrito to implement the Poverty Stoplight with the goal of empowering the
community to eliminate their poverty-related challenges. Over the course of 4 years, this collaboration
has matured into a robust working group that harmonizes the community's grassroots efforts with
governmental support, highlighting the government's role as an essential enabler of development and
recognizing the community's potential to lead transformative change.
In the Cerrito case study, families collaboratively work on both their individual poverty situations and
communal challenges. This collective effort involves creating strategies and making decisions that
affect everyone in the community. The process starts with a self-assessment to identify personal
challenges, aspirations, and priorities, fostering a bottom-up approach that empowers the community
and ensures contextually relevant and sustainable solutions. Such community-driven goal-setting and
development planning enhance a sense of ownership and agency among members.
The government, on the other hand, assumes the role of enabler and facilitator. It provides essential
resources, support, and a conducive environment for the initiative to thrive. Local government
authorities collaborate with community members to identify needs, allocate resources, and align
policies with community-driven priorities. This model of collaborative governance creates a space for
dialogue, allowing the government to effectively respond to the changing needs of the community.
Regular interactions, workshops, and consultations foster a sense of camaraderie and trust. The
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 761.
initiative's framework, encompassing indicators of multidimensional poverty, resonates with the
broader government development agenda, facilitating alignment and synergy between the two entities.
In the Stoplight-Cerrito initiative, noteworthy achievements include infrastructure developments and
strategic partnerships that have significantly benefited the community. Key accomplishments include
the construction of a community-managed well providing clean water access, the revitalization of
artisan markets linking to larger sales channels, and the creation of a market for local entrepreneurs,
bolstering both economic activity and social cohesion. These efforts have been amplified by the
collaborative engagements with national and international universities, NGOs, private entities, and
public institutions, enriching the community with diverse resources and expertise. Additionally, civil
society have been instrumental in fortifying the initiative through their provision of technical support,
expansive networks, and evaluative capabilities, thereby maximizing the project’s scope and impact.
While there have been significant results, the Stoplight-Cerrito initiative has faced a number of
challenges that have shaped its execution and impact. These challenges, some of them anticipated
and others unforeseen, have highlighted the inherent complexities in addressing multidimensional
poverty and fostering community-driven change. One of the main challenges has been navigating
cultural diversity and social dynamics within the community. Cerrito is a tapestry of diverse identities,
including indigenous families of the Toba Qom ethnicity and non-indigenous families with ancestral
ties to Swiss and Italian immigrants. Bridging cultural gaps, addressing historical disparities, and
ensuring equitable participation among these groups has posed intricate challenges. Adapting the
Stoplight methodology to resonate with each cultural context while fostering a sense of unity and
shared purpose required a delicate balancing act.
The Stoplight-Cerrito initiative initially grappled with complex social hierarchies and existing power
dynamics, which posed challenges to both community cohesion and individual agency. According to
Tellez et al. (2020), there was a notable tension between collective agency and delegated agency within
the community, with a tendency to rely on established leaders sometimes limiting equitable
participation. In response, the initiative focused on redistributing leadership to foster both communal
and individual empowerment more effectively. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
introduced unprecedented challenges, exacerbating these issues. The shift towards digital
engagement, necessitated by lockdowns and social distancing measures, brought the digital divide into
sharp relief, making it harder for some community members to stay connected and engaged. This
situation demanded innovative solutions to maintain support for all, particularly the most vulnerable
families. The pandemic, therefore, served as a catalyst for the initiative to develop more inclusive and
adaptable strategies. These strategies aimed to bridge the digital gap and ensure that the principles of
distributed leadership and empowerment could withstand and adapt to the extraordinary
circumstances posed by the pandemic, ultimately strengthening the community's resilience and
collective efficacy.
Resource allocation and sustainability presented another set of challenges. While the initiative's
multidimensional approach resonated with the government's development agenda, ensuring consistent
and adequate funding remained a challenge. Balancing short-term resource allocation with long-term
sustainability required careful planning, advocacy, and innovative fundraising strategies. The initiative
had to continually demonstrate its impact to maintain stakeholder support and secure the necessary
resources for expansion.
The Stoplight-Cerrito initiative faced the intricate task of transforming cultural norms and conventional
mindsets about poverty and individual agency. It necessitated redefining community perceptions of
poverty from a stance of dependency to one of empowerment and self-determination. Concurrently, the
initiative operated amidst a challenging socio-economic landscape where indigenous Toba Qom
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 762.
families experienced limited access to essential services. Strategic coordination with local authorities
and public sector agencies was critical to navigate these systemic barriers, requiring a concerted effort
characterized by negotiation and a mutual commitment to the community’s prosperity.
The participatory elements of collective agency and the "Life Map" approach are central to the
program's impact within the Toba Qom community. Research underscores the significance of collective
agency, where community members, guided by their leaders, collaborate towards common objectives,
reflecting a deep respect for the community's cultural and social fabric. This synergistic collaboration
underpins a mutual support system that enhances the community's capacity for poverty alleviation.
Concurrently, the "Life Map" technique, which originates from the self-assessment process, enables
communities to prioritize improvement areas, address causes of poverty, and devise tangible solutions.
This process not only emboldens community-driven initiatives but also cultivates problem-solving
capabilities, reinforcing resilience and adaptability. Such empowerment instills confidence in the
community to enact positive change and maintain persistent efforts in poverty reduction.
This study highlights the link between empowerment and poverty reduction in participatory
development programs, pointing to crucial areas for further research. Comparative analysis with
traditional approaches and the integration of stakeholder perspectives, including program participants,
will offer a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of participatory methods.
Additionally, examining the role of modern technologies in enhancing these programs can provide
insights into new avenues for innovation. Addressing these areas will deepen our understanding of
participatory development's role in empowering individuals and reducing poverty.
Case Study 2: Poverty Stoplight Implementation within the Ministry of Agriculture in Ecuador
In 2019, Ecuador's Ministry of Agriculture, under the leadership of Minister Xavier Lazo, integrated the
Poverty Stoplight tool into their operations with the goal of addressing multidimensional poverty among
farming families. The Ministry implemented the tool with hundreds of families, aiming to encourage
other government sectors to adopt a similar holistic approach in supporting them out of poverty.
Despite the challenges and the lukewarm response from other public entities, Minister Lazo's
department managed to administer the PS survey to 993 families, totalling 3,589 individuals.
Recognizing the intertwined nature of agricultural and social issues, as livelihoods were largely
dependent on small-scale farming and related activities, the initiative aimed to gather data for a deeper
understanding of community needs, provide targeted support, and foster empowerment among the
constituents.
Minister Lazo's initiative to integrate the Poverty Stoplight within agricultural communities benefited
significantly from the established trust and local knowledge of agricultural technicians. These
professionals, already familiar with the territories and families involved, were pivotal in introducing the
tool to associations and their members. Their credibility and established relationships facilitated the
administration of the surveys and helped in managing expectations. Initially, there was skepticism
among participants regarding the purpose of the tool and a general distrust towards government
initiatives. Nevertheless, once the technicians provided thorough information and demonstrated the
intent of the Poverty Stoplight, participants appreciated the opportunity to self-identify their needs and
strengths, which in turn, allowed them to communicate effectively with authorities, thus fostering a
sense of satisfaction and empowerment.
Likewise, the substantial interest and dedication shown by the head of the Ministry significantly
facilitated the implementation of this tool by other department members. This was particularly true as
Minister Lazo incorporated the Poverty Stoplight into the department's list of objectives, easing its
adoption. This project was heavily promoted by the Ministry, as part of its strategic work with the target
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 763.
population. This advantage was key to the tool’s implementation because of the Ministry of
Agriculture’s commitment to dedicate its resources to the cause. Continuously, they applied for funding
with the World Food Program, meaning that they had greater leeway to invest in the Poverty Stoplight.
The initial success of the Poverty Stoplight implementation by the Ministry of Agriculture encountered
obstacles due to varying levels of commitment from other government departments. Initially, there was
interest from various agencies in the project, led by Minister Lazo. Some departments participated in
creating indicators and adaptation sessions, such as the Health Ministry's involvement in the "Health
and Environment" dimension. However, as the project evolved to demand more time, resources, and
personnel for activities like administering surveys, these agencies began to reduce their involvement.
This reluctance was mainly due to the resource-intensive nature of the project's later phases, including
fieldwork and financial investment, leading to a decrease in support and undermining the
comprehensive approach required to address the poverty indicators effectively. Complicating matters
further, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and a change in presidential administration disrupted the
continuity of the program. Follow-up interventions and progress monitoring were significantly affected.
Interviews with the management team highlighted that such political and structural shifts are major
challenges in public sector collaborations, often resulting in the discontinuation of initiatives by new
administrations that may be unprepared or unwilling to continue programs initiated by their
predecessors.
Members of the Poverty Stoplight implementation team have reported that the survey uncovered
previously unknown needs in different communities. To illustrate, Ecuador boasts high literacy rates,
with illiteracy being a well-addressed concern among its population. For this reason, those that
analyzed the aggregated data provided by the surveys were surprised when the data collected in one
of the provinces (Cotopaxi) showed astoundingly high illiteracy reports. While global data showcased
Ecuador as a mostly literate country, this province’s Stoplights showed that 51.49% of families were in
the red level (extreme poverty) in the indicator “Knows how to read, write, and comprehend”1 and 12.7%
of families were in the yellow (poverty) level. The Poverty Stoplight identified this formerly undetected
deprivation.
According to interviews with staff from the Ministry of Agriculture for this paper, the Poverty Stoplight
was instrumental in revealing trends in farmers' quality of life based on their association memberships.
The Stoplight's diagnostic results indicated that farmers affiliated with well-organized associations,
which had proper standards and offered benefits, received more substantial assistance. In contrast,
farmers who were part of more "informal" and "less developed" associations did not enjoy these
benefits, a factor that the Stoplight revealed to be negatively affecting their quality of life.
The Ministry of Agriculture, while not fully implementing the Stoplight program due to its complex
methodology, has proactively developed strategies to improve participant outcomes. These include
collaborations with government agencies and offering diverse training, like financial education. Despite
challenges in fully deploying the program, particularly in coordinating among various government
departments, there has been a notable interest in using the survey results for better resource allocation.
The promising results and stakeholder engagement demonstrate the program's potential
effectiveness. However, the program's continuity and success face risks from changes in government
administrations, which can alter policy priorities and funding. To mitigate these risks and ensure long-
1 Green: All members of my family (fifteen years and older) can read, write and do so with ease.
Yellow: All the adult members of my family (fifteen years and older) know how to read and write, but at least one has
difficulty reading and/or writing their ideas.
Red: At least one adult member of my household (fifteen years and older) cannot read and/or write.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 764.
term sustainability, it is crucial to consider strategies like gaining bipartisan support, framing the
program as a state policy rather than a government-specific initiative, and securing a stable funding
structure.
Case Study 3: Poverty Stoplight Implementation with Municipalities in Paraguay
Fundación Paraguaya engaged in a significant partnership with 45 municipal governments in Paraguay
to adopt the Poverty Stoplight as a key instrument for fostering local economic development. The
initiative's core aim was to identify and mitigate the primary challenges hindering the growth of local
entrepreneurs. Through the implementation of the Poverty Stoplight with local informal entrepreneurs,
local policymakers, NGOs, and community leaders were equipped with actionable insights to address
these challenges. The tool not only facilitated the identification of obstacles to economic participation,
but also provided practical solutions to enhance sustainable growth and improve the overall economic
health of the communities.
Municipal governments in Paraguay, guided by specific legislative mandates, are tasked with
implementing comprehensive development programs to address barriers that hinder local progress,
particularly for vulnerable groups. These programs encompass a wide array of social services, aiming
to bolster areas such as nutrition, healthcare, education, and economic opportunities. However, these
efforts are often impeded by challenges like resource constraints, lack of standardized project
management processes, and insufficient expertise in program execution. This report consolidates
recommendations and alternative strategies to enhance municipal support systems, ensuring effective
social and economic upliftment for community entrepreneurs and aligning local initiatives with broader
development objectives.
In Paraguay, entrepreneurs—particularly the most vulnerable—face significant barriers that impede their
business growth and overall well-being, impacting their socio-economic contribution and their
communities' development. With entrepreneurs representing 80% of the employed demographic, the
nation's economic health is intertwined with their success. Yet, according to the 2022 Permanent
Household Survey (INE, 2022), around a third of Paraguayans live in poverty, many of whom are
entrepreneurs in precarious conditions. The Poverty Stoplight initiative has been instrumental in
identifying these barriers, which range from limited financial access, deficiencies in planning and
entrepreneurial skills, and lack of enabling public policies, to gender-based discrimination and
insufficient intersectoral cooperation. Moreover, municipal governments encounter parallel challenges
in addressing community issues, compounded by financial and human resource limitations,
bureaucratic hurdles, and resistance to adopting new technologies. The goal of uncovering these
obstacles is to provide policymakers and community leaders with actionable solutions, aiming to
enhance social and economic development through increased participation and the elimination of
these systemic barriers.
The implementation of the Poverty Stoplight as a tool for development within municipalities in Paraguay
has yielded significant achievements. A transformative shift in paradigm marked the project's
approach, transitioning from conventional organizational involvement to a participatory model driven
by Paraguayan families themselves. A robust network of implementers was established at both family
and community levels, fostering a bottom-up trajectory for development. The project's outreach was
substantial, with 4371 local government officials gaining familiarity with the Poverty Stoplight through
1457 presentations, subsequently leading to 522 signatories pledging to champion its adoption.
Notably, 350 individuals underwent comprehensive training, equipping them with the necessary skills
to effectively engage with the tool. The culmination of these efforts was exemplified by 678 families
successfully completing the Poverty Stoplight assessment.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 765.
The project expanded its reach outside of family settings, impacting 45 municipalities and involving
420 potential candidates, which indicates the broader acknowledgment and significance of the Poverty
Stoplight. Additionally, the project gained support from a variety of stakeholders, with 522
organizations, including neighborhood committees, associations, community groups, communal
kitchens, NGOs, and indigenous communities, supporting the tool's implementation. This wide-ranging
success demonstrates the project's ability to foster a participatory and inclusive development process,
reflecting its relevance to both Paraguayan communities and municipal bodies.
DISCUSSION
In the three case studies, there are challenges and successes in the implementation of the Poverty
Stoplight that can shed light on how participatory tools can provide local governments with bottom-up
data and a methodology to foster participation between communities and governments to improve the
quality of life of citizens.
In terms of challenges, in all cases balancing cultural diversity and social dynamics within the
community proved challenging, requiring adaptation of the Stoplight methodology to resonate with
different cultural contexts while fostering unity. In the case of Cerrito, pre-existing social hierarchies
and power imbalances posed significant challenges to community inclusion and cohesion. The concept
of "agency" within this community revealed nuanced distinctions between collective agency and
delegated agency, particularly evident in research on the Poverty Stoplight's impact on family and
collective agency. Here, the community's reliance on established leaders and figures of authority for
initiating change had the potential to impede equitable participation and ownership. Navigating these
intricate dynamics became a central task for the initiative, striving to empower both individuals and
families while fostering an environment conducive to distributed leadership and thriving collective
efforts. These challenges shed light on the intricate web of power dynamics in participatory
development, emphasizing the critical need to address these complexities for achieving more inclusive
participation and community ownership.
Regarding the second case study, overcoming challenges within the community demanded persistent
efforts to challenge cultural norms and reshape mindsets regarding poverty and agency. Cultural norms
and pre-existing beliefs had to be redefined to foster new community roles and responsibilities.
Simultaneously, confronting entrenched social hierarchies and power dynamics presented hurdles to
achieving community inclusion and cohesion, calling for a dual approach: empowering individuals and
redistributing leadership. In the third case study regarding municipalities in Paraguay, the barriers
hindering entrepreneurs, especially the most vulnerable, have a profound impact on their “power to”,
compromising their ability to engage in community development. Given the significant role
entrepreneurs play in Paraguay's economy, addressing these obstacles was paramount.
The allocation of resources emerged as a persistent challenge across the three case studies, revealing
intricate power dynamics at play. In Cerrito, sustaining funding for the initiative proved difficult,
highlighting the need for continuous advocacy and innovative fundraising strategies to secure financial
support. In Ecuador, despite the initial involvement of various government departments, resource
allocation became a stumbling block when the project demanded monetary resources and time from
officials, leading to stagnation in subsequent phases. Paraguayan municipalities of the third case study,
while pivotal in driving these efforts, faced constraints in terms of insufficient human, financial, and
temporal resources. Furthermore, a lack of standardized methodologies and knowledge hindered the
execution of projects in diverse contexts, diminishing their efficiency and effectiveness.
The COVID-19 pandemic also presented unprecedented challenges across the case studies, demanding
adaptability and resilience. In Cerrito, lockdowns and distancing measures disrupted conventional
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 766.
engagement and mentoring methods, leading to the swift adoption of innovative digital solutions.
However, this transition to virtual platforms exposed the digital divide within the community,
highlighting disparities in technological access and digital literacy. In Ecuador, the pandemic and a
change in leadership within the Ministry of Agriculture disrupted the project's continuity and
interventions for improving indicators.
In terms of successes, in all three cases the integration of self-assessment and mentoring empowered
participants, allowing them to identify needs and develop practical plans, fostering ownership and
agency. This not only provided local governments with bottom-up data, but in addition, measuring
multidimensional poverty with a diverse set of indicators effectively captured comprehensive
community challenges and aspirations, enhancing engagement and relevance. Beyond the diagnostic
aspect of the Poverty Stoplight, the "life map" approach where families make a plan to overcome their
deprivations with a mentor resulted in a process that included participatory planning, promoting
community-led initiatives and problem-solving skills. In the case of the third case study, the primary
objective of identifying these barriers was to equip policymakers, community leaders, and
entrepreneurs with concrete solutions to eliminate obstacles and foster participation, ultimately
promoting social and economic development within communities.
The emergence of 'power with' is most notably demonstrated in the Cerrito case, where the indigenous
Toba Qom community united to pursue common objectives. Through collaborative effort, the
community pooled their resources, knowledge, and efforts, enabling them to advocate effectively for
their needs and work towards overcoming systemic barriers. Their interaction with local authorities and
alignment with ongoing development efforts are prime examples of leveraging collective strength for
community empowerment.
In contrast, the Ecuador project showcases a blend of 'power over' and 'power with.' Minister Lazo’s
leadership at the Ministry of Agriculture was instrumental, as he integrated the Poverty Stoplight into
the department's main objectives and ensured resource allocation. This top-down approach was
complemented by collaboration with agricultural associations and technicians, who brought vital local
knowledge and built trust with participants. Their role was pivotal in managing expectations and
fostering collective action, illustrating how leadership and community collaboration can synergistically
contribute to the success of development initiatives.
These instances set the stage for understanding the broader power dynamics at play across the case
studies. The 'power to' effect change is seen in the self-assessment and mentoring processes of the
Poverty Stoplight initiative, where participants actively identify and tackle their challenges. 'Power
within' is highlighted by communities like the Toba Qom, who used their collective identity and cultural
strength to adapt the tool to their context. This internal empowerment was key in challenging norms
and adopting a proactive development stance. Furthermore, the ‘power with’ dynamic, essential for
collaborative strength, is evident in all three case studies, especially in Cerrito’s collective action with
the local government. This interplay of power forms underscores the multifaceted nature of
empowerment in participatory development, suggesting that recognizing and fostering these dynamics
can significantly boost the impact of initiatives like the Poverty Stoplight towards more sustainable and
inclusive outcomes.
Our study's insights highlight several pivotal aspects of participatory development. Effective
implementation necessitates dedicated leadership and consistent support from all government
departments, a standard set by Minister Lazo's efforts in Ecuador. The collaborative integration of
various governmental agencies is crucial for a comprehensive approach to poverty elimination.
Moreover, challenges such as limited resources and changes in leadership present common hurdles in
participatory initiatives. The most effective participatory features identified include self-assessment
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 767.
paired with mentoring, which enhances ownership and self-agency among participants. Additionally,
using a multifaceted set of indicators to measure multidimensional poverty allows for a more accurate
reflection of poverty's complexities, as demonstrated in the municipalities' case. The Cerrito case
further reveals the power of collective agency and unity in enacting substantial change. Lastly, aligning
development projects with community-specific priorities, like the "Agricultural Development" aspect in
Ecuador, ensures that initiatives resonate with and meet the unique needs of the communities they
serve.
CONCLUSION
To truly empower citizens, we need to move beyond the limited perspective of the ladder of
participation. Rather than viewing citizen participation as a linear progression, it is essential to think
more thoroughly about the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between citizens and civil
servants/public sector employees.
A key feature that becomes evident across the case studies is the importance of forming strategic
alliances or networks to carry out interventions that promote sustainable development. To achieve this,
it is essential to generate synergies between sectors and actors in society to promote a virtuous circle
that enables effective social interventions. Forming these alliances is not an easy task, since they must
be developed on the basis of common principles, values and objectives among the various actors, each
of whom can contribute their experience and knowledge. Generating this convergence requires
recognition of the needs and challenges of society itself and the development of its members. It is
important that state institutions contribute to prepare these leaders for these leadership situations and
also establish control and accountability mechanisms. Offering spaces to provide local government
public servants with the knowledge and skills to implement a dignity-based, bottom-up solution to the
elimination of multidimensional poverty in their communities may be a promising pathway to increased
citizen participation in development.
Further research is crucial to deepen our understanding of the relationship between empowerment and
poverty reduction. Our study has shown a positive correlation, but the causality behind this link needs
more detailed examination. Future studies should particularly focus on how participatory elements like
mentoring and self-assessment contribute to reducing poverty. Longitudinal studies could be
instrumental in establishing this direct causality. Additionally, it is vital to investigate the influence of
cultural and socio-economic contexts on these empowerment programs. Developing robust
methodologies for impact measurement that incorporate both qualitative and quantitative data will
enhance the effectiveness of poverty alleviation initiatives.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 768.
REFERENCES
Alsop, R. (2005). Power, rights and poverty: Concepts and connections. World Bank.
Arnstein, S. (1969). Ladder of Citizen Participation. (35th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 216–224). Journal of the
American Institute of Planners.
Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment–an experiential account. Development in
Practice, 17(4-5), 557–565.
Batliwala, S. (2019). All About Power: Understanding Social Power & Power Structures. Namati.
Bhaskar, L. (2008). Elected Women Representatives: Participation and Decision-making, in:
Ganesamurthy, V.S. (Ed.), Empowerment of Women in India: Social, Economic, Political. New Century
Publications, Singhal, pp. 83–93.
Camfield, L. (2006). Why and how of understanding “subjective” wellbeing: Exploratory work by the WeD
group in four developing countries. . WeD Working Paper, 26. University of Bath, WeD - Wellbeing in
Developing Countries ESRC Research Group.
Camfield, L., & McGregor, J. A. (2005). Resilience and well-being in developing countries. In M. Ungar
(Ed.), Handbook for Working with Children and Youth: Pathways to Resilience Across Cultures and
Contexts. Sage Publications.
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development,
22(7), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(94)90141-4
Chopra, D. (2019). Taking care into account: Leveraging India’s MGNREGA for women’s empowerment.
Development and Change, 50(6), 1687–1716.
Clark, D. A., Frediani, A. A., & Biggeri, M. (2019). The capability approach, empowerment and
participation: concepts, methods and applications. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cornwall, A. (2016). Women’s Empowerment: What Works? Journal of International Development,
28(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3210
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “Participation”: models, meanings and practices. Community
Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature,
50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
Duvendack, M., & Mader, P. (2020). IMPACT OF FINANCIAL INCLUSION IN LOW‐ AND MIDDLE‐INCOME
COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REVIEWS. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3).
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12367
Eyben, R., Kabeer, N., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Conceptualising empowerment and the implications for pro
poor growth A paper for the DAC Poverty Network. Institute of Development Studies.
Gaventa, J. (1982). Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley.
Contemporary Sociology, 11(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2067130
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 769.
Gessese, N. B. (2020). Poverty-alleviation communication practices of the Jerusalem Children and
Community Development Organization (JeCCDO) in Negede Woito community, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Palgrave Communications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0424-5
Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable
Indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35(4), 379–403.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897
ILO. (2013). 9. Local Development Strategies. In The Informal Economy and Decent Work: A Policy
Resource Guide Supporting Transitions to Formality. ILO.
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---
emp_policy/documents/publication/wcms_210470.pdf
INE. (2022). Encuesta Permanente de Hogares Continua 2022. Gobierno del Paraguay.
INE. (2023). ENCUESTA PERMANENTE DE HOGARES CONTINUA (EPHC) TRIMESTRAL, 2017/23.
Gobierno del Paraguay.
Institute of Development Studies. (2011). Blurring the Boundaries: Citizen Action Across States and
Societies.
Jennings, R. (2000). Participatory Development as New Paradigm: The Transition of Development
Professionalism. Prepared for the “Community Based Reintegration and Rehabilitation in Post-Conflict
Settings” Conference, Washington, DC.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s
Empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
Kabeer, N. (2005). Is microfinance a “magic bullet” for women’s empowerment? Analysis of findings
from South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 4709–4718.
Kabeer, N. (2018). Gender, livelihood capabilities and women’s economic empowerment: reviewing
evidence over the life course. Gage.
Keetie Roelen, Barnett, I., Johnson, V., Lewin, T., Thorsen, D., & Ton, G. (2020). Understanding Children’s
Harmful Work: A Review of the Methodological Landscape. ACHA Working Paper 3, Institute of
Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/acha.2020.001
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Luttrell, C., Bird, K., Carter, J., & Chakravarti, D. (2007). The power cube explained. 3, 1–5. Poverty-
Wellbeing Platform.
Mayoux, L. (1998). Participatory Programme Learning for Women’s Empowerment in Micro-Finance
Programmes: Negotiating Complexity, Conflict and Change. 29(4), 39–56. IDS Bulletin.
Mercado, M. (1997). Mujer y Política Agraria en México: exclusión y resistencia. Alberti M. Pilar y Emma
Zapata M. Desarrollo Rural y de Género [Estrategias de sobrevivencia de mujeres campesinas e
indígenas ante la crisis económica.]. In Estrategias de sobrevivencia de mujeres campesinas e
indígenas ante la crisis económica. Colegio de Posgraduados de Chapingo.
Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities : gender hierarchies in development thought. Verso.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, diciembre, 2023, Volumen IV, Número 6 p 770.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press Of
Harvard Univ. Press.
Organizing Engagement. (2019, November 1). Ladder of Citizen Participation. Organizing Engagement.
https://organizingengagement.org/models/ladder-of-citizen-participation/
Pane, J. C. (2021). How does empowerment happen? Exploring the Process of Empowerment through
Narratives of Women Who Participated in Microfinance-Plus Programmes in Paraguay [PhD
Dissertation].
McGee, R., & Pettit, J.(2019). Power, Empowerment and Social Change. Routledge.
Pomeranz. (2014). The promise of microfinance and women’s empowerment. What does the evidence
say? EY Building a better world. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/EY-The%20promise-of-
microfinance-and-womens-empowerment_14123436-7f3a-4a87-a76f-94e931c9ed5e.pdf
Pretty, J., Dalal-Clayton, B., & Bass, S. (1995). Participation in Strategies for Sustainable Development.
Environmental Planning Issues, 7. https://www.environmental-
mainstreaming.org/nssd/pdf/IIED08.pdf
Priya, P., Venkatesh, A., & Shukla, A. (2021). Two decades of theorising and measuring women’s
empowerment: Literature review and future research agenda. Women’s Studies International Forum,
87, 102495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102495
Ramos, N., & Hammler, K. (2021). Methodology Manual. 3, 1–44. Fundación Paraguaya.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Concluding Reflections: Whither Action Research? The SAGE
Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934
Roelen, K., Barnett, I., Johnson, V., Lewin, T., Thorsen, D., & Ton, G. (2020). Understanding Children’s
Harmful Work: A Review of the Methodological Landscape. Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxfam.
Sen, A. (1985). Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy,
82(4), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
Sen, A. (2001). Development as Freedom. Anchor Books, New York.
Shannon, L., & O’leary, F. (2020). Local Government: Engaging and Empowering Local Communities.
Institute of Public Administration (IPA).
Tellez, N., Ramos, N., & Hammler, K. (2020). El Efecto Del Semáforo En La Agencia de Las Familias de
La Comunidad de Cerrito Benjamín Aceval. Fundación Paraguaya.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q8n2ZDq2XFY_-fZrahVn_Cp9RmSda3f6/view
World Bank. (2014). Global financial development report 2014: Financial inclusion. World Bank
Publications.
Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment Theory. In: Rappaport, J., Seidman, E. (eds) Handbook of
Community Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, publicados en este sitio está
disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons .