LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3415.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2503
Reimagining Indigenous Education in Costa Rica through
Paulo Freire’s Pedagogical Lens: A Critical Analysis
Reimaginar la educación indígena en Costa Rica a través de la lente
pedagógica de Paulo Freire: un análisis crítico
Dianala Bernard
dianala.bernard@uopeople.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-0435
School of Education, University of the People
Estados Unidos
Artículo recibido: 31 de julio de 2024. Aceptado para publicación: 14 de agosto de 2024.
Conflictos de Interés: Ninguno que declarar.
Abstract
The present research analyzes Paulo Freire's renowned work Pedagogy of the Oppressed within the
context of education for Costa Rica’s Indigenous populations. It critically examines Costa Rican
education and its role in perpetuating or challenging oppression in Indigenous populations. Freire
argues that traditional models of education, where teachers impart information to passive students,
serve to maintain the status quo and oppress the marginalized, such as Indigenous communities.
Instead, he proposes a problem-posing approach that encourages critical thinking, dialogue, and
collective action to transform unjust realities. Emphasizing the examination of the possible impact of
Freirean pedagogy on Indigenous culture, language, socialization, Social and Emotional Learning (SEL),
and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP), the present study explores the complexities of educational
theory and practice for Indigenous populations in Costa Rica. In examining how Freire's pedagogical
principles intersect with Indigenous populations' unique challenges and opportunities, this analysis
aims to inform policy and practice toward educational equity and social justice for Costa Rica’s eight
Indigenous populations.
Keywords: Paulo Freire, pedagogy of the oppressed, indigenous education, Costa Rica,
culturally responsive pedagogy, educational equity
Resumen
La presente investigación analiza la célebre obra de Paulo Freire, Pedagogía del oprimido, en el
contexto de la educación para las poblaciones indígenas de Costa Rica. Examina críticamente la
educación costarricense y su papel en perpetuar o desafiar la opresión en las poblaciones indígenas.
Freire sostiene que los modelos tradicionales de educación, donde los maestros imparten información
a estudiantes pasivos, sirven para mantener el estatus quo y oprimir a los marginados, como las
comunidades indígenas. En su lugar, propone un enfoque de educación problematizadora que
fomenta el pensamiento crítico, el diálogo y la acción colectiva para transformar realidades injustas.
Enfatizando el examen del posible impacto de la pedagogía freireana en la cultura indígena, el idioma,
la socialización, el Aprendizaje Social y Emocional (SEL, por sus siglas en inglés) y la Pedagogía
Culturalmente Receptiva (CRP, por sus siglas en inglés), el presente estudio explora las complejidades
de la teoría y la práctica educativa para las poblaciones indígenas en Costa Rica. Al examinar cómo
los principios pedagógicos de Freire se intersectan con los desafíos y oportunidades únicos de las
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3416.
poblaciones indígenas, este análisis pretende informar la política y la práctica hacia la equidad
educativa y la justicia social para las ocho poblaciones indígenas de Costa Rica.
Palabras clave: Paulo Freire, pedagogía de los oprimidos, educación indígena, Costa Rica,
pedagogía culturalmente receptiva, equidad educativa
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades,
publicado en este sitio está disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons .
Cómo citar: Bernard, D. (2024). Reimagining Indigenous Education in Costa Rica through Paulo Freire’s
Pedagogical Lens. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 5 (4), 3415 –
3437. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2503
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3417.
INTRODUCTION
Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed advocates a shift from teacher-centered to student-centered
education, emphasizing dialogue, critical thinking, and liberation. This model transforms education into
a tool for empowerment and social change (Black et al., 2024; Freire, 2014; Lancy, 2024; Meliqulova,
2024). In Costa Rica, Indigenous communities encounter significant educational hurdles, including
language barriers and institutionalized discrimination, hindering educational equity and self-
determination (Minority Rights Group International, 2022). These communities should leverage their
traditional knowledge and values through legislative activism and stakeholder engagement to advocate
for educational systems that reflect their cultural practices and worldviews (Black et al., 2024).
This study employs a qualitative observational methodology supplemented by relevant research to
explore the impact of implementing the Freirean pedagogy approach on Indigenous education in Costa
Rica. Observations were conducted in various Indigenous communities to document educational
practices, cultural activities, and social interactions. The observational data were complemented by a
literature review on Indigenous populations in Costa Rica, focusing on historical, cultural, and
educational contexts. Data were then analyzed through thematic analysis, highlighting themes related
to language, culture, socialization, Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), and Culturally Responsive
Pedagogy (CRP).
In suggesting the integration of Freire's principles into Indigenous education, the study aims to promote
equity and enable meaningful participation in society for Costa Rica’s Indigenous communities. It
emphasizes respecting and nurturing Indigenous languages, cultures, beliefs, and values to foster
educational liberation and social justice. Further, in highlighting Indigenous learners' voices and
experiences, the research seeks to contribute to a more inclusive and emancipatory educational
dialogue, advocating for a holistic, culturally, and historically relevant approach to education (Bernard,
2023a, 2024; Freire, 2014; Legette et al., 2021; Selby et al., 2020).
DEVELOPMENT
Since Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed challenges traditional education by advocating for a
pedagogy of liberation entrenched in dialogue, critical thinking, and mutual respect, applying Freire's
ideas to Indigenous education requires careful consideration of cultural differences and power
dynamics. Indigenous communities have their own authority and knowledge transmission systems that
differ from Western educational models, including diverse approaches like Montessori, constructivist,
and STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics)/STEAM (science, technology,
engineering, arts, and mathematics) initiatives. Thus, a critical analysis must explore how Freire's ideas
can complement, rather than replace, Indigenous pedagogies.
Understanding the historical and contemporary context of Indigenous education is crucial. Colonial
legacies, land dispossession, and unequal access to resources continue to shape educational
experiences for Indigenous youth (Black et al., 2024; Camacho-Nassar, 2019). Despite Costa Rica
adopting the United Nations (UN) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and ratifying ILO
(International Labour Organization) Convention 169, rights to land and self-determination remain a
struggle (Camacho-Nassar, 2019). Freire highlights how oppression conditions the thoughts of the
oppressed, making it difficult for them to disentangle their identity from their oppressors (Freire, 2014).
This analysis should, therefore, consider how structural inequalities, such as linguistic and cultural
barriers, intersect and impact current educational practices.
Freire (2014) suggests that the oppressed sometimes adhere to their oppressors in a complex
psychological relationship, preventing them from recognizing their subjugation. Recent studies
(Maenette et al., 2017; Lawton, 2022) highlight the importance of knowledge transfer from elders in
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3418.
Indigenous education to challenge existing power dynamics and the psychological impacts of
oppression. Freire's pedagogy promotes awareness, empowerment, and action through education,
encouraging Indigenous individuals to pursue opportunities and advocate for their rights.
Critical concepts of Freirean pedagogy, such as conscientization, dialogue, and praxis, provide insights
into the dynamics of oppression within educational contexts and offer pathways toward emancipation
and social change (da Costa, 2024; Lawton, 2022; Peter, 2024; Samacá Bohórquez, 2020; Valls-Carol et
al., 2022; Black et al., 2024; Rodriguez & Navarro-Camacho, 2022). Integrating these concepts can help
create educational practices that respect and nurture Indigenous cultures, contributing to broader
social justice goals.
Conscientization or Critical Consciousness
Central to Freire's pedagogy is the concept of conscientization, or critical consciousness (Badenhorst
et al., 2023; da Costa, 2024; Freire, 2014; Lawton, 2022; Peter, 2024). It involves individuals critically
reflecting on their social, political, and economic realities, thereby gaining awareness of the structural
forces perpetuating oppression. According to Lawton, "[Conscientization] is the process of moving
from naive or passively received understandings of self, others, and the world to more critical and active
understandings, of moving from partialized or focalized views of reality to a more total and contextual
view" (p. 50). Through conscientization, learners move beyond passive acceptance of the status quo
and become active agents in their liberation (Lawton, 2022; Peter, 2024). In Indigenous education,
conscientization can inspire learners to challenge colonial legacies, assert their cultural identities, and
reclaim their rights to self-determination (Camacho-Nassar, 2019; Cruz, 2021; Valenzuela, 2023).
Dialogue and Reflection
Freire accentuates dialogue's role in fostering mutual understanding, respect, and collaboration in
education (Freire, 2014; Samacá Bohórquez, 2020; Valls-Carol et al., 2022). This approach transcends
traditional teacher-student hierarchies, promoting reciprocal learning and critical reflection. Dialogue
bridges cultural traditions and contemporary practices in Indigenous education, facilitating
intergenerational learning and preserving Indigenous knowledge. Authors like Domoff et al. (2023) and
Selby et al. (2020) agree, highlighting the importance of culturally relevant, community-based education
models that address Indigenous children's academic, cultural, spiritual, and physical needs, aiming to
empower students and foster social justice.
Praxis or Empowerment and Self-Determination
Freire (2014) advocates for praxis, which involves thoughtful reflection and informed action, leading to
continuous improvement and transformation. Praxis encourages individuals to critically analyze their
experiences, identify injustices, and take purposeful action to address systemic inequalities. This could
encourage students to become community change agents, linking critical awareness with practical
efforts. In Indigenous education, praxis can empower learners to advocate for policies that honor
cultural diversity, promote linguistic revitalization, and prioritize holistic development (Black et al., 2024;
Freire, 2014; Popielarz, 2024; Rodriguez & Navarro-Camacho, 2022).
Integrating language and culture, socialization, SEL, and CRP within Freirean pedagogy enriches the
understanding of education in Indigenous contexts. Indeed, according to the World Bank (2019),
[Forty-two] million indigenous people live in Latin America and the Caribbean. 560 indigenous
languages are spoken, but 1 out of 5 indigenous populations have lost their native language over the
past few decades. 26% of Indigenous languages are at risk of disappearing. (para. 1)
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3419.
Social exclusion and poverty contribute to the loss of Indigenous languages and cultures (Durocher,
2024). Thus, creating a learning environment that values all students' experiences and voices promotes
academic success and social justice. This integration makes education more inclusive and supportive,
ensuring it educates, heals, and empowers historically marginalized communities. Consequently,
education, as suggested by Freire, must foster identity, resilience, and a profound sense of belonging
among Indigenous students (Bernard, 2023a, 2024; Durocher, 2024; Freire, 2014; Legette et al., 2021;
World Bank, 2019).
Language and Culture
Language and culture are foundational to education, shaping identity, worldview, and learning
experiences (Fountain, 2023; Wodon & Cosentino, 2019). Paulo Freire's (2014) pedagogy underscores
the importance of cultural and linguistic context in the learning process, advocating for an educational
approach that respects and integrates the cultural realities of learners. Language allows individuals to
communicate, share ideas, and pass down traditions, while culture encompasses a society's beliefs,
values, customs, and behaviors. According to Freire, education should be a process of cultural action
for freedom, where the oppressed are empowered to reclaim their language and culture to resist
domination and assert their identity.
Culture influences how individuals perceive the world, interact with others, and understand their place
in society. It is learned and transmitted through socialization, education, and shared experiences
(Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Fountain, 2023). Freire’s (2014) concept of dialogical education
emphasizes the dynamic relationship between language and culture, promoting an interactive learning
environment where students and educators engage in a mutual exchange of knowledge and
experiences. This approach could foster critical consciousness and help learners understand their
cultural identity better.
Language and culture are deeply interconnected, each shaping and being shaped by the other. This
interplay is complex in multilingual societies as individuals navigate multiple linguistic identities,
reflecting and influencing their cultural affiliations. This phenomenon, known as straddling cultures,
can lead to a rich, multifaceted sense of identity and pose challenges to social integration and personal
coherence. Recognizing and validating Indigenous languages and cultural practices are essential for
fostering belonging, pride, and resilience within Indigenous populations (Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez,
2023; Fountain, 2023; Wodon & Cosentino, 2019). Freire’s (2014) emphasis on cultural identity and
linguistic diversity underscores the need for an inclusive curriculum. Such a curriculum should celebrate
Indigenous learners' cultural and linguistic heritage, promoting social justice and educational equity.
Socialization
Socialization is the lifelong process through which individuals acquire the knowledge, skills, values,
norms, and behaviors needed to function effectively in society (Kovalenko, 2020; Nickerson, 2024;
Spears, 2020). Paulo Freire's (2014) pedagogical approach emphasizes the role of education in
socialization, advocating for a process where learners critically engage with their cultural and social
realities to develop a sense of agency and empowerment. Beginning with primary socialization within
the family, where children learn basic behaviors, language, and cultural norms, it continues through
secondary socialization in schools, peer groups, workplaces, religious institutions, and media. Freire's
concept of conscientization aligns with this process, encouraging individuals to reflect critically on their
social contexts and transform their understanding through dialogue and action.
Significant life changes necessitate resocialization, adjusting one's identity and behavior. Freire (2014)
highlights the importance of education as a means of continuous transformation, where learners are
not only recipients of knowledge but active participants in shaping their identities and social roles. This
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3420.
perspective ensures that education is not static but dynamic, allowing for constantly renegotiating
social norms and values. Socialization ensures cultural continuity, social cohesion, and the
development of individual identity and self-concept, addressing social issues and fostering inclusive
communities. Freire’s pedagogy supports this by promoting an educational environment that respects
and incorporates all learners' cultural backgrounds and experiences, fostering inclusivity and social
justice.
In Indigenous communities, socialization should emphasize cultural traditions, kinship networks, and
communal values, with education playing a vital role in transmitting cultural knowledge and ethical
principles (Kovalenko, 2020; Nickerson, 2024; Spears, 2020). Freire’s (2014) approach to education as
a practice of freedom aligns with these values, advocating for a culturally responsive pedagogy that
honors and integrates Indigenous ways of knowing and being. This approach preserves cultural
heritage and empowers Indigenous learners to critically engage with and transform their social realities,
promoting cultural resilience and community cohesion.
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL)
SEL encompasses a range of socio-emotional skills essential for personal and interpersonal well-being,
including emotional literacy, self-awareness, empathy, and relationship-building (Bernard, 2023a;
Greenberg, 2023). These skills help individuals manage emotions, set and achieve goals, show
empathy, maintain positive relationships, and make responsible decisions (Bernard, 2023a; Greenberg,
2023; Jones & Doolittle, 2017). Paulo Freire’s (2014) pedagogical approach can enhance the
implementation of SEL by encouraging a critical examination of socio-emotional skills within the
broader context of social justice and empowerment. Freire's emphasis on critical consciousness, or
conscientization, aligns with the goals of SEL, fostering emotional literacy, self-awareness, and
empathy, but extends these concepts to include understanding one's social and political context.
SEL can be taught in schools to enhance students' ability to integrate thinking, emotions, and behavior,
leading to positive outcomes (Bernard, 2023a; Jones & Doolittle, 2017). Freire's (2014) approach to
education emphasizes dialogue and reflection, which are fundamental to SEL. Engaging students in
meaningful discussions about their emotions and social interactions helps educators better
understand themselves and others. This reflective practice is essential for cultivating empathy and
building positive relationships. Freire's dialogic method transforms the classroom into a space where
students can explore and articulate their feelings and experiences, fostering a supportive and
empathetic learning environment.
In Indigenous education, SEL could be most effective when integrated with cultural contexts,
incorporating Indigenous values and traditions, reinforcing community values like respect for elders,
interconnectedness with nature, and communal responsibility, and fostering emotional resilience,
interpersonal harmony, and community solidarity alongside academic achievement (Lancy, 2024).
Freire's (2014) pedagogical principles support this integration by advocating for culturally relevant
education that respects and honors students' lived experiences and cultural backgrounds. In
embedding SEL within the cultural framework of Indigenous communities, educators can promote
social and emotional learning that is not only relevant but transformative, ensuring that SEL does not
merely adapt to cultural contexts superficially but engages deeply with Indigenous ways of knowing,
thereby fostering a more holistic and impactful learning experience (Freire, 2014). Through this critical
analysis lens, the implementation of SEL in Indigenous education promotes both personal well-being
and collective empowerment, aligning with Freire’s vision of education as a practice of freedom.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3421.
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP)
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP) acknowledges and celebrates learners' cultural diversity,
creating environments that affirm students' cultural identities and experiences (Ladson-Billings, 1994a,
1994b; Liando & Tatipang, 2024). Rooted in Critical Pedagogy (CP), CRP challenges traditional
educational models that neglect diverse cultural contexts, advocating for education as a transformative
tool to critique and reform oppressive social structures (Bello, 2023; Soler-Gallart, 2023; Akinsanya &
Ojotule, 2022; Samacá Bohórquez, 2020; Valls-Carol et al., 2022). In Indigenous education, CRP
promotes culturally relevant content and pedagogical practices that honor Indigenous knowledge
systems, fostering educational equity and social justice (Rigney, 2020). Integrating Freirean pedagogy
with CRP provides a framework for critically analyzing and improving Indigenous education, aiming for
educational liberation, cultural revitalization, and social transformation (Dodgson, 2019, 2021; Freire,
2014; Peter, 2024; Washington & Johnson, 2023).
Freire’s Pedagogy Explained
Freire’s (2014) pedagogy asserts that education is inherently political, with traditional methods often
perpetuating oppression by treating learners as passive recipients (Ford, 2021). This is particularly
relevant for Indigenous populations, where conventional education frequently neglects their histories,
knowledge systems, languages, and cultural practices (Apaydin, 2020; Durocher, 2024; Rodriguez &
Navarro-Camacho, 2022). A critical analysis must examine how Freire's ideas align or conflict with
Indigenous values and whether his model can integrate Indigenous epistemologies and communal
learning styles. Washington and Johnson (2023) state, “The mischaracterizations of Indigenous
families and communities as deficient, uncaring, and uninvolved ignore thousands of years of self-
determination and leadership in the education of their children” (para. 4).
Underlying Assumptions
Since Freire's pedagogy views education as integrally political, critiquing traditional approaches that
treat learners as passive recipients and maintain oppressive structures (Bello, 2023; Freire, 2014; Soler-
Gallart, 2023), conventional educational practices that often neglect Indigenous cultural, historical, and
linguistic knowledge systems must be challenged. In accord with Freire, Selby et al. (2020) highlight
community-as-pedagogy programs in rural areas that empower youth by integrating local knowledge
and participation, fostering stewardship and leadership skills through experiential learning and
mentorship from community elders and leaders. A critical analysis should examine how Freire's
assumptions align or conflict with Indigenous communities' values, needs, and aspirations and whether
his model can incorporate Indigenous epistemologies and communal learning styles. For example,
while there are significant areas of alignment between Freire's pedagogy and proposed Indigenous
education, particularly in their shared goals of empowerment and contextual learning, there are also
critical concerns in epistemology, focus, and methods, such as in the valuation of knowledge sources,
the role of community in the learning process, and the modes of knowledge transmission, that need to
be addressed for effective integration of Freire’s pedagogy.
Strengths
One of the key strengths of Freire's pedagogy is its focus on dialogue and problem-posing education,
which encourages active participation and critical thinking among learners away from an oppressive
view (Bello, 2023; Freire, 2014; Soler-Gallart, 2023). Thus, aligning with Freire, Valenzuela (2023)
proposes six criteria for decolonizing curricula and pedagogies in Latin America, aiming to challenge
and transform colonial structures. These criteria focus on integrating Indigenous knowledge, promoting
social justice, and fostering inclusive and equitable academic environments. This approach can be
particularly empowering for Indigenous students, as it promotes using their native languages and
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3422.
cultural contexts as bases for learning and critical inquiry, fostering an educational environment where
Indigenous knowledge is valued, and students are agents in their lived experiences, especially
educational journeys. Additionally, this pedagogical approach supports the decolonization of education
by challenging the dominance of teacher-centered Western curricula and promoting cultural
sustainability (Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Cruz, 2021; Dembicz, 2021; Freire, 2014; Marín
Herrera et al., 2020; Rodriguez & Navarro-Camacho, 2022; Tafjord, 2020; Valenzuela, 2023; Villhauer,
2021).
Limitations
While influential, Freire's (2014) pedagogy may have limitations in indigenous contexts. Implementing
a dialogic and problem-posing model within rigid state education systems, with their standardized
curricula and assessments, can be challenging (Akinsanya & Ojotule, 2022; Peter, 2024). Additionally,
Freire's focus on class struggle may not fully address the linguistic, cultural, and historical factors
shaping Indigenous oppression. Peter (2024) emphasizes developing critical consciousness to
empower individuals and promote social justice, encouraging learners to question and transform
limitations. Therefore, a critical analysis must assess how well Freire's class-based analysis applies to
the culturally specific oppression experienced by Indigenous populations (Akinsanya & Ojotule, 2022;
Badenhorst et al., 2023; Peter, 2024).
Implications for Practice
Applying Freire's pedagogy to Indigenous education suggests a shift toward inclusive models
integrating Indigenous languages, cultures, and epistemologies (Barros & De Oliveira, 2022; Freire,
2014). This approach could enhance educational outcomes for Indigenous students and promote
social justice, cultural preservation, and empowerment. Bridging gaps between Indigenous and non-
Indigenous students would create a more equitable educational environment. Integrating Indigenous
knowledge into the curriculum fosters respect for cultural diversity among all students. Policymakers
and educators must adapt educational systems to meet Indigenous communities' needs, potentially
requiring teacher training, curriculum development, and governance reforms. These efforts can lead to
a cohesive society where Indigenous voices are valued and integral to the national narrative (Barros &
De Oliveira, 2022; Cruz, 2021; Núñez et al., 2020).
Costa Rica's Indigenous Populations
Costa Rica has eight Indigenous populations, as indicated in Table 1, with distinct languages, cultures,
and traditions. The populations are Bribrí, Cabécar, Ngäbe (or Ngöbe and known as Guaymies), Boruca
(also known as Brunka), Huetar, Maleku (or Malecu and known as Guatuso), Chorotega, and Térraba
(also known as Teribe, Naso, or Brörán). These Indigenous groups inhabit 24 different regions of Costa
Rica through various executive decrees since the 1950s and have unique cultural practices and
identities, languages, histories, and educational challenges (Durocher, 2024). In Dembicz (2021), the
Costa Rican Native community is reported as slightly less than 70,000, constituting less than 2% of the
general population and holding approximately 7% of the country's territory. Despite facing land rights
issues, social marginalization, and economic disparities, Indigenous communities try to preserve their
cultural heritage, albeit in various degrees, and contribute to Costa Rica's cultural diversity (Black et al.,
2024; Camacho-Nassar, 2019; Ixchíu, 2020; Villhauer, 2021). Embracing Indigenous peoples' cultural
richness and diversity would help Costa Rica foster a more inclusive and equitable society for future
generations (Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-
Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Dembicz, 2021; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024; Marín
Herrera et al., 2020; Rodriguez & Navarro-Camacho, 2022; Tafjord, 2020; Villhauer, 2021).
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3423.
Table 1
Summary of Indigenous Populations in Costa Rica
Indigenous
Group
Primary Region Key Cultural
Practices
Educational
Challenges
Current Initiatives
Bribrí Talamanca Traditional stories Language barriers Bilingual
programs
Cabécar Talamanca Cultural
ceremonies
Integration issues Bilingual
programs
Ngäbe Puntarenas Agriculture, crafts Socio-economic
challenges
Cultural education
Boruca
(Brunka)
Southern Pacific Resistance history Language
revitalization
Cultural education
Huetar Central Region (La
Meseta Central)
Traditional
knowledge
Cultural
assimilation
Reclaiming
knowledge
Maleku
(Malecu)
Arenal Volcano
Region
Environmental
stewardship
Limited resources Environmental
education
Chorotega Guanacaste Pottery-making Language loss Cultural
revitalization
Térraba
(Teribe)
Puntarenas Cultural traditions Educational
resources
Language
programs
The Bribrí and Cabécar, residing primarily in the Talamanca region, face obstacles related to language
barriers and the integration of their languages and cultures into the formal education system. For
example, the Talamanca region's Bribrí and Cabécar communities have implemented bilingual
education programs that integrate traditional stories and cultural practices, significantly improving
student engagement and cultural pride. Similarly, the Ngäbe people, one of the largest Indigenous
groups in Costa Rica, face socio-economic challenges and linguistic barriers within the formal
education system. Therefore, promoting Ngäbere language and cultural education is crucial for
preserving Ngäbe cultural heritage and empowering Ngäbe youth. The Boruca (Brunka) people, known
for their resistance against Spanish colonization, prioritize revitalizing the Brunka language and culture.
Strengthening Brunka language and cultural education is vital for promoting cultural resilience among
Boruca youth (Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Cruz, 2021;
Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024; Marín Herrera et al., 2020).
The Huetar, historically inhabiting the central region of Costa Rica (la Meseta Central), face challenges
in reclaiming and preserving traditional knowledge due to cultural assimilation. Revitalizing Huetar
culture and language requires collaborative efforts to reclaim and preserve traditional knowledge
(Villalobos-Araya, 2020). The Maleku (Malecu) people, residing near the Arenal Volcano, emphasize
environmental stewardship and traditional practices in their cultural identity. Strengthening Maleku
language and cultural education is crucial for promoting cultural resilience and educational
empowerment (Curtis, 2021; Solis-Aguilar, 2022). The Térraba, residing primarily in the Puntarenas
province, also face significant challenges in preserving their language and culture amidst modern
pressures and limited educational resources. Enhancing educational programs incorporating the
Térraba language and traditions is essential for cultural survival and empowerment (Black et al., 2024;
Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar,
2023; Durocher, 2024).
Lastly, the Chorotega people, historically known for advanced pottery-making techniques, strive to
preserve and revitalize their culture despite language loss and cultural assimilation (Apaydin, 2020;
Dembicz, 2021; Wallerstein, 2010). Efforts to preserve and revitalize Chorotega culture are essential for
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3424.
promoting cultural diversity and honoring Indigenous heritage in Costa Rica. These initiatives, centered
around bilingual education programs, culturally relevant curriculum development, and community-led
efforts, are necessary to address these Indigenous populations' educational needs and cultural
preservation. Embracing such measures helps Costa Rica ensure its educational systems are inclusive
and empowering, allowing Indigenous communities to thrive while maintaining their unique cultural
identities. This comprehensive approach supports a broader vision where education becomes a tool
for social justice, fostering respect and appreciation across diverse cultural landscapes (Apaydin, 2020;
Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Dembicz, 2021; Durocher &
Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024; Sun et al., 2022; Wallerstein, 2010).
Linguistic and Cultural Dimensions of Indigenous Education in Costa Rica
Indigenous languages and cultures are foundational for educational practices and identity formation,
serving as vehicles for knowledge transmission, cultural preservation, and fostering a sense of
belonging and pride (Apaydin, 2020; Wodon & Cosentino, 2019). A World Bank report highlights that
Indigenous Peoples often have less access to quality education (Wodon & Cosentino, 2019). Ferguson
and Weaselboy (2020) emphasize that Indigenous languages encapsulate ecological knowledge
crucial for sustainable land stewardship and environmental sustainability (Apaydin, 2020; Black et al.,
2024).
In Central America, particularly Costa Rica, efforts are made to teach Indigenous languages like Boruca
through programs initiated by the National University of Costa Rica and the Department of Indigenous
Education (Ixchíu, 2020). However, external pressures, especially with demands for the exclusive use
of Spanish, threaten these languages. Costa Rica's Indigenous Education Program, established in 2009,
aims to address the educational needs of Indigenous and migrant populations, stressing tolerance and
respect for diversity. Similarly, Freire’s pedagogy stresses the importance of cultural identity and
empowerment through education, including validating and promoting Indigenous languages and
knowledge systems (Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Freire, 2014).
Accordingly, the education system faces challenges in providing quality education to Indigenous
children, migrants, marginalized groups, and those with disabilities, highlighting the need for tailored
programs and policies (Bernard, 2023b; Minority Rights Group International, 2022). Initiatives to
integrate Indigenous culture into education promote interculturality and inclusivity, with local schools
and cultural events like the Fiesta de los Diablitos helping preserve Indigenous languages and
traditions. The Ngäbe, Costa Rica's largest native group, try to maintain their traditional language and
practices while engaging in agriculture and crafts (CRESPIAL, 2018; Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020,
2021).
Challenges Related to the Preservation of Indigenous Languages and Cultural Heritage
Indigenous communities' rich linguistic and cultural diversity face increasing threats from historical
marginalization, globalization, and assimilationist educational policies (see Table 2). In formal
education, Indigenous languages and cultural practices are often marginalized in favor of colonial
languages and Eurocentric curricula, leading to the endangerment and potential extinction of many
Indigenous languages and the erosion of cultural traditions (Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021;
Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Cruz, 2021; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024;
Tichnor-Wagner, 2020; Valenzuela, 2023). The implications of these challenges are profound, as they
threaten the cultural identity, continuity, and resilience of Indigenous communities, making it imperative
to address these issues through targeted educational and policy interventions.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3425.
Table 2
Challenges Related to the Preservation of Indigenous Languages and Cultural Heritage
Challenge Description
Structural Barriers Limited resources, lack of qualified Indigenous teachers, inadequate
funding for culturally and historically relevant materials
Discriminatory
Attitudes
Marginalization of Indigenous learners and the undermining of cultural pride
Language Policies Policies prioritizing the dominant language (Spanish) erode Indigenous
linguistic diversity and cultural heritage
Thus, as reflected in Table 2, the challenges in preserving Indigenous languages and cultural heritage
include structural barriers such as limited resources, a lack of qualified Indigenous teachers, and
inadequate funding for culturally and historically relevant materials. Discriminatory attitudes and
policies further marginalize Indigenous learners and undermine their cultural pride (Camacho-Nassar,
2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher,
2024). Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach that values Indigenous languages and
cultural heritage, empowering Indigenous communities to reclaim their languages and shape
educational policies. Collaborative partnerships among Indigenous communities, educators,
policymakers, and other stakeholders are essential to creating inclusive and culturally responsive
educational systems that honor Indigenous diversity and promote equity and justice (Maenette et al.,
2017).
Socialization and Identity Formation in Indigenous Populations of Costa Rica
Education plays a crucial role in shaping Indigenous youth's identity, reinforcing societal norms or
challenging dominant narratives, and providing opportunities for self-discovery and empowerment
(Apaydin, 2020; Wodon & Cosentino, 2019). Indigenous education systems incorporate cultural
traditions, ceremonies, and storytelling, helping learners develop a strong sense of identity and
connection to their heritage (Schroeder et al., 2022). Using Indigenous languages as the primary
medium of instruction benefits students by allowing them to engage with their cultural environment
and express their identities. However, many Indigenous children are taught in languages they do not
speak, hindering their learning and cultural connection (Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-
Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024).
Mainstream educational systems often neglect the importance of teaching Indigenous languages,
contributing to their decline and the erosion of cultural identity. Experiential and community-based
approaches involving elders and knowledge holders as mentors influence Indigenous youth's
socialization and identity formation. Centering Indigenous language and culture in education helps
students develop strong cultural identities, self-esteem, and a sense of belonging, leading to higher
academic achievement and reduced dropout rates. This culturally relevant education enables
Indigenous communities to maintain their traditions while adapting to modern challenges (Camacho-
Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher, 2022; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023;
Durocher, 2024; Maenette et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2022).
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3426.
Table 3
Educational Experiences and Identity Formation
Experience Type Description
Positive Experiences Affirm Indigenous identities
Foster cultural pride and resilience
Negative Experiences Cultural erasure and discrimination
Undermine the sense of identity
Educational experiences influence how Indigenous youth perceive themselves and their roles within
their communities (see Table 3). Positive experiences affirming Indigenous identities can foster cultural
pride and resilience, while negative experiences characterized by cultural erasure and discrimination
can undermine their sense of identity. Addressing these challenges requires decolonizing educational
systems, centering Indigenous perspectives, and fostering culturally affirming learning environments.
Collaborative efforts among educators, policymakers, and community members are essential to
transform educational practices, empowering Indigenous youth and contributing to the revitalization
and resilience of their communities (Camacho-Nassar, 2019, 2020, 2021; Camacho-Nassar & Durocher,
2022; Cruz, 2021; Durocher & Camacho-Nassar, 2023; Durocher, 2024; Valenzuela, 2023; Badenhorst et
al., 2023; Bello, 2023; Freire, 2014; Peter, 2024; Popielarz, 2024; Sun et al., 2022).
Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in Indigenous Education of Costa Rica
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), as summarized in Table 4, encompasses skills, attitudes, and
behaviors that help individuals understand and manage emotions, establish positive relationships, and
make responsible decisions, recognizing the essential role of emotional and social competence in
academic success and overall well-being (Bernard, 2023a; Goforth et al., 2022; Mahfouz & Anthony-
Stevens, 2020). In Indigenous education, SEL supports the socio-emotional well-being and resilience of
learners who navigate complex socio-cultural contexts marked by intergenerational trauma and
systemic inequities. In cultivating skills such as self-regulation, empathy, and communication,
Indigenous youth can overcome daily challenges, build positive relationships, and shape their futures
with a sense of agency (English et al., 2021; Goforth et al., 2022; Mahfouz & Anthony-Stevens, 2020;
Selby et al., 2020).
Table 4
SEL Framework
SEL Component Description
Emotional Literacy and Self-
awareness
Recognizing one’s emotions and values
Empathy Understanding and sharing the feelings of others
Relationship-building Establishing and maintaining positive relationships
Responsible Decision-making Making ethical, constructive choices about personal and
social behaviors
Integrating SEL into curricula aligns with Indigenous ways of knowing, promoting holistic development
by addressing mind, body, spirit, and community interconnectedness. In Costa Rica, Indigenous
educators and community leaders use SEL to create nurturing learning environments that honor cultural
values, promote healing, and empower learners (Selby et al., 2020). Culturally relevant SEL approaches
integrate traditional practices, storytelling, and land-based learning, helping learners connect with their
heritage, develop a sense of belonging, and strengthen their cultural identity (Black et al., 2024; Ixchíu,
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3427.
2020; Matafwali & Mofu, 2023; Schroeder et al., 2022; Villhauer, 2021). Circle processes and the
involvement of elders as cultural mentors support community building and emotional resilience. These
practices honor Indigenous ways of knowing, nurture holistic development, and empower Indigenous
communities (Goforth et al., 2022; Mahfouz & Anthony-Stevens, 2020; Sun et al., 2022).
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP) in Indigenous Populations of Costa Rica
CRP is an educational approach that centers on learners' cultural backgrounds, experiences, and
perspectives within the teaching and learning process. CRP recognizes the importance of cultural
diversity and seeks to create inclusive and equitable learning environments that validate and affirm the
identities of all students. Within Indigenous education, CRP is particularly critical for honoring
Indigenous ways of knowing and being, promoting cultural revitalization, and empowering Indigenous
learners to succeed academically and thrive as individuals and members of their communities
(Badenhorst et al., 2023; Jacobs & Haberlin, 2022).
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP) highlights students' strengths and assets, empowering them as
lifelong learners and critical thinkers. In integrating students' cultural backgrounds into classroom
instruction, CRP fosters an inclusive environment where students feel a sense of belonging and
engagement. For Indigenous populations in Costa Rica, CRP principles are crucial. Educators can
respect and celebrate Indigenous cultural identities, leading to better engagement, motivation, and
academic success. Embracing CRP creates culturally affirming environments that empower Indigenous
learners and support the revitalization and empowerment of Indigenous communities (Liando &
Tatipang, 2024).
Strategies for Strengthening CRP within Indigenous Education Contexts
Community Engagement and Collaboration: Work with Indigenous communities, elders, and cultural
organizations to co-design culturally relevant curricula and materials that reflect local traditions and
languages (Maenette et al., 2017; Popielarz, 2024; Selby et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2022).
Language Revitalization and Maintenance: Prioritize preserving and revitalizing Indigenous languages
through bilingual or multilingual instruction, immersion programs, and culturally relevant language
resources (Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Druviete, 2023; Mendecka, 2023; Pamungkas et al.,
2023).
Cultural Immersion and Experiential Learning: Offer students cultural immersion experiences, such as
community-based projects, cultural exchanges, and traditional ceremonies, to deepen their
understanding of and connection to Indigenous heritage (Maenette et al., 2017; Popielarz, 2024; Selby
et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2022).
Incorporating Indigenous Perspectives Across Disciplines: Integrate Indigenous perspectives,
histories, and contributions across all academic disciplines to create a more inclusive and diverse
curriculum (Bolton et al., 2023; Jimenez & Kabachnik, 2023; John & John, 2023; Warbrick et al., 2023).
Teacher Professional Development and Support: Provide ongoing professional development for
teachers to understand CRP principles and practice culturally responsive teaching, including
workshops, mentoring, and collaborative lesson planning (Biswal & Sahoo, 2023; Ho et al., 2023;
Kushwaha & Singh, 2023).
Looking Ahead: Implications for Education in Costa Rica's Indigenous Populations. According to
Dembicz (2021),
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3428.
For several decades the Costa Rican state ignored the existence of ethnic diversity in its territory – both
in regards to Indigenous peoples as well as to communities of African origins. It was only in 1977 that
the so-called "Indigenous Law" (Ley indígena) was adopted, settling the basic principles of the
autonomy and the rights of these groups, such as ownership. (p. 288)
The educational implications in Costa Rica's Indigenous populations are as multifaceted as each
Indigenous community and require tailored approaches that address each community's unique cultural,
linguistic, and socio-economic contexts. Adopting holistic, culturally responsive approaches to
education that honor the rights, languages, and cultures of Indigenous populations in Costa Rica is
essential. Therefore, in prioritizing Indigenous voices, knowledge, and aspirations in educational policy
and practice, Costa Rica can promote more significant equity, inclusion, and empowerment for all its
citizens. Thus, the following vital implications must be considered:
Culturally and Historically Relevant Curriculum
Education initiatives must prioritize culturally relevant curriculum development incorporating
Indigenous languages, histories, and traditions. This approach ensures that education reflects
Indigenous students' cultural identities and experiences, fostering a sense of belonging and pride in
their heritage.
Bilingual Education: Implement bilingual programs to support Indigenous language revitalization,
strengthening language skills, and promoting academic success and cultural continuity (Avendaño &
Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Baeza et al., 2023; Mendecka, 2023; Wei, 2023).
Community-Led Education Initiatives: Engage Indigenous communities in designing and implementing
education to ensure relevance and effectiveness, empowering them to shape educational priorities that
reflect their cultural values (Pal & Sarkar, 2023; Sun et al., 2022).
Teacher Training and Capacity Building: Provide educators in Indigenous communities with training in
culturally responsive teaching, language instruction, and intercultural communication to effectively
engage with diverse backgrounds and needs (Gomes & Dumont-Pena, 2023; Indigenous Planet, 2022;
Sajat et al., 2023).
Recognition of Indigenous Education Rights: Policies should respect Indigenous communities' rights
to control their educational systems, secure funding for Indigenous-led initiatives, and address barriers
to access and equity (Forest Carbon Partnership, 2023; Villhauer, 2021).
Partnerships and Collaboration: Foster collaboration among Indigenous communities, educational
institutions, government agencies, and civil society to advance educational equity and cultural
revitalization, leveraging collective resources and expertise (Quirós et al., 2023).
Environmental and Cultural Education: Integrate environmental and cultural education into initiatives
to promote sustainability and cultural preservation, connecting Indigenous knowledge with formal
curricula to foster holistic learning and understanding of the link between culture, land, and identity
(Black et al., 2024; Ixchíu, 2020; Villhauer, 2021).
Possible Barriers to Implementing Culturally and Historically Responsive and Educational Liberation
Institutionalized Racism: Indigenous communities face systemic racism in education, leading to
disparities in funding, resources, and opportunities. Discriminatory practices and Eurocentric curricula
marginalize Indigenous languages, cultures, and knowledge, perpetuating educational inequity
(Durocher, 2024; Efimoff & Starzyk, 2023).
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3429.
Language Policies: Policies prioritizing dominant languages erode Indigenous linguistic diversity and
cultural heritage. Limited access to bilingual education, inadequate teacher training, and lack of
culturally relevant materials further marginalize Indigenous learners and undermine academic success
(Avendaño & Angulo-Jiménez, 2023; Cubero, 2023; Mendecka, 2023; Porter & Morrison, 2024; Wang,
2023).
Resource Disparities: Indigenous communities often face inadequate school funding, limited access
to educational technology and infrastructure, and shortages of qualified teachers. These resource gaps
exacerbate educational inequalities, hindering academic achievement and cultural revitalization (Song,
2023; Zamzuri et al., 2023).
Accordingly, Indigenous communities in Costa Rica, its educators, and policymakers can work together
to address these challenges and seize opportunities for collaboration and advocacy. Together, there
are opportunities to build more inclusive, equitable, and culturally and historically responsive education
systems that empower Indigenous learners, celebrate Indigenous cultures, and promote social justice
and liberation.
Advocacy for Policy Reform, Capacity Building, and Professional Development
Looking ahead, advocating for policy reforms that prioritize Indigenous rights, languages, and cultures
in education, as well as strengthening partnerships between Indigenous communities, educators,
policymakers, and stakeholders, is crucial to addressing disparities and promoting educational equity
for Indigenous learners. Paulo Freire's (2014) principles of education as a practice of freedom
underscore the importance of these reforms, as they aim to empower marginalized communities
through dialogue, critical thinking, and active participation. The Costa Rican National Indigenous Round
Table (MNICR) emphasizes the need for education tailored to Indigenous communities, integrating
political, community, and educational perspectives (Educational International, 2012). This aligns with
Freire’s advocacy for a problem-posing education that respects and incorporates the cultural and social
realities of the learners. Additionally, UNICEF (2019) stresses the importance of incorporating
Indigenous culture into education to promote interculturality and integrate Indigenous knowledge into
various aspects of life, reflecting Freire’s vision of education as a means of cultural affirmation and
liberation. Embracing Freirean pedagogy, policy reforms can foster an educational environment that
addresses the systemic inequities Indigenous populations face and celebrates and revitalizes their
cultural heritage (Freire, 2014).
Providing ongoing capacity-building and professional development for educators, policymakers, and
community members is essential for fostering culturally responsive education. Paulo Freire’s (2014)
emphasis on dialogue and praxis—reflective action—supports the idea that empowering stakeholders
through training programs, resources, and support networks enables them to implement effective
strategies in Indigenous education. This aligns with Freire’s view that education should be a
collaborative process that transforms both educators and learners. For instance, the Women's Antenna,
a project led by Cabécar women in Costa Rica, exemplifies the empowerment of Indigenous women
through technology development, fostering community resilience (Camacho et al., 2023). This project
reflects Freire’s principles by encouraging active participation and critical thinking within the
community. Maravalle and González Pandiella (2023) highlight the need for improvements in Costa
Rica's education system to enhance quality and reduce inequality, suggesting policy recommendations
to support equitable development. This aligns with Freire's call for a more equitable education system
that addresses the needs of the oppressed. Similarly, the Capacity Building Program for Indigenous
Peoples and Civil Society Organizations, led by groups like ACICAFOC, supports REDD+ capacity-
building projects, empowering Indigenous stakeholders in sustainable initiatives (Forest Carbon
Partnership, 2023; Indigenous Planet, 2022; Villhauer, 2021). These initiatives embody Freire’s vision of
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3430.
education as a tool for social change, promoting sustainable development and empowering
communities through active engagement and critical consciousness.
CONCLUSIONS
This study finds that Freirean pedagogical principles offer a transformative framework for Indigenous
education. Further, integrating language, culture, socialization, SEL, and CRP education systems can
better support Indigenous students' academic success and cultural preservation. Policymakers should
consider these factors to promote educational equity and social justice. In centering dialogue,
conscientization, and praxis, Freirean pedagogy aligns closely with the values and aspirations of
Indigenous communities, providing a powerful tool for promoting educational liberation and social
justice. This analysis has underscored the critical importance of drawing on culture, language,
socialization, SEL, and CRP in educational theory and practice, particularly within indigenous contexts
in Costa Rica. Integrating these elements into educational policies, practices, and initiatives creates
more inclusive, equitable, and empowering learning environments that honor Indigenous learners'
rights, languages, and cultures. Thus, centering language, culture, socialization, SEL, and CRP in
educational theory and practice creates transformative learning experiences that empower Indigenous
learners, celebrate cultural diversity, and advance educational equity and social justice for Indigenous
populations in Costa Rica and beyond.
Furthering the Research
Research on the intersections of culture, language, socialization, SEL, and CRP in Costa Rica's
Indigenous education should focus on several key areas, which include analyzing other models that
integrate Indigenous languages and cultures, identifying best practices for culturally relevant SEL
frameworks, and exploring community-led initiatives that promote educational equity. Paulo Freire’s
pedagogy emphasizes the importance of understanding and valuing learners' cultural and social
contexts, which aligns with the need to integrate Indigenous perspectives into education. Additionally,
research should examine the socialization processes shaping Indigenous children's cultural identity,
the impact of Indigenous language instruction on academic and social outcomes, and the effectiveness
of teacher education programs in preparing culturally responsive educators. Freire’s concept of
conscientization, or developing critical consciousness, can guide these efforts, ensuring that
educational practices impart knowledge and empower students to engage with and transform their
realities critically. Community engagement and partnerships should also be assessed to incorporate
Indigenous knowledge meaningfully into curricula and policies, reflecting Freire’s belief in education as
a dialogical process that respects and incorporates the voices and experiences of marginalized
communities. This research can inform more equitable and inclusive educational practices that support
the well-being and success of Indigenous students, fostering an educational environment that
promotes social justice and liberation (Education International, 2012; Freire, 2014; Sun et al., 2022;
UNICEF, 2019).
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3431.
REFERENCES
Akinsanya, P. O., & Ojotule, A. O. (2022). Freire’s critical pedagogy and professional teaching in the
twenty-first century. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 14(3), 145-160.
https://www.unijerps.org/index.php/unijerps/article/view/365
Apaydin, V. (2020). 9. Indigenous Latino heritage: Destruction, invisibility, appropriation, revival,
survivance. In Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage: Construction, Transformation
and Destruction (pp. 155–168). University College London.
Avendaño, C. S., & Angulo-Jiménez, H. (2023). Thematic picture dictionaries and other visual resources
for Costa Rican Indigenous languages: Beyond bilingual equivalencies. Dictionaries: Journal of the
Dictionary Society of North America, 44(2), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2023.a915073
Badenhorst, P., Martin, D., & Smolcic, E. (2023). Critical consciousness development for teachers of
multilingual learners: A cultural/linguistic immersion program shaping early teaching careers. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 136, 104376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104376
Baeza, A., Anderson, P., & White, S. (2023). Highlighting the voice of Indigenous communities for
education: Findings from a case study in rural Chile. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education,
52(2). https://doi.org/10.55146/ajie.v52i2.331
Barros, S. R., & De Oliveira, L. C. (2022). Paulo Freire and multilingual education. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003175728
Bello, M. B. (2023). An understanding of Paulo Freire's "Pedagogy of the Oppressed". Canadian
Journal of Family and Youth/Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse, 15(1), 225–231.
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjfy29905
Bernard, D. M. (2023a). Emotional literacy and self-awareness in adolescents: Exploring Brené Brown's
atlas of the heart for schools. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 6775-6798.
https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6673
Bernard, D. M. (2023b). Rethinking “Educación Diversificada” for Afro-descendants in Costa Rica.
Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/14-4-07
Bernard, D. M. (2024). Understanding socioculturalism in early childhood education: Current
perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 73(3), 16-31.
https://doi.org/10.7176/JCSD/73-03
Biswal, P., & Sahoo, C. (2023). Customised training programme for the Indigenous Population: A
systematic review. Industrial and Commercial Training, 55(4), 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-12-
2022-0090
Black, S. P., Bolaños Palmieri, C., Eng, C., Faerron Guzmán, C., Fundora, Y., Garro Valverde, L., & Morales
Morales, J. C. (2024). Autonomy, land stewardship, and indigenous emancipatory praxis through
legislative activism in Costa Rica and multilateral institutions. In C. Smith-Morris & C. E. Abadia
(Eds.), Countering modernity: Communal and cooperative models from indigenous peoples (pp. 103-
120). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003473565
Bolton, J., Remedios, L., & Andrews, S. (2023). Enriching research practices through knowledge about
Indigenous research methodologies. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional
Journal, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.758
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3432.
Camacho, K., Herrera, E., Xie-Li, D., & Arias-Méndez, E. (2023). The women's antenna: An experience of
community technology construction led by Cabécar women of Costa Rica. In 2023 IEEE International
Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IHTC58960.2023.10508857echav
Camacho-Nassar, C. (2019). Indigenous world 2019: Costa Rica. IWGIA.
https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-rica/3377-iw2019-costa-rica.html
Camacho-Nassar, C. (2020). Indigenous world 2020: Costa Rica. IWGIA.
https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-rica/3619-iw-2020-costa-rica.html
Camacho-Nassar, C. (2021). Indigenous world 2021: Costa Rica. IWGIA.
https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-rica/4213-iw-2021-costa-rica.html
Camacho-Nassar, C., & Durocher, B. (2022). Indigenous world 2022: Costa Rica. IWGIA.
https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-rica/4666-iw-2022-costa-rica.html
CRESPIAL (2018). La fiesta de los diablitos – COSTA RICA. http://crespial.org/la-fiesta-de-los-diablitos-
costa-rica/
Cruz, J. D. (2021). Colonial power and decolonial peace. Peacebuilding, 9(3), 274–288.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1906516
Cubero, K. (2023). Intercultural communicative competence through CLIL and PBL hybrid approach: A
Costa Rican perspective. DEDiCA Revista de Educação e Humanidades (dreh), 21, 29-56.
https://doi.org/10.30827/dreh.vi21.23757
Curtis, B. (2021). The environment and poverty reduction. In Understanding global poverty (pp. 267–
289). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043829
da Costa, O. B. R. (2024). Brazilian and educator: Paulo Freire and a brief insight into his journey in
education. Observatório de la Economía Latinoamericana, 22(2), e3215.
https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv22n2-084
Dembicz, K. (2021). Indigenous populations of Costa Rica. In Conflicts over use of urban and regional
spaces in the time of climate changes: Good management and planning practices, pp. 284–
303. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa
Dodgson J. E. (2019). Why we need to critically analyze the science. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3),
403–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419852309
Dodgson J. E. (2021). Critical analysis: The often-missing step in conducting literature review research.
Journal of Human Lactation, 37(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0890334420977815
Domoff, V., Pratt, Y., Drefs, M., & Wick, M. (2023). Challenging Definitions of Student Success Through
Indigenous Involvement: An Opportunity to Inform School Psychology Practice. Canadian Journal of
School Psychology, 38(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735221149225
Druviete, I. (2023). Integrating language policy in educational programmes: The international decade of
Indigenous Languages for language awareness. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 55,
707–715. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2023.55
Durocher, B. (2024). Indigenous world 2024: Costa Rica. IWGIA. https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-
rica/5381-iw-2024-costa-rica.html
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3433.
Durocher, B., & Camacho-Nassar, C. (2023). Indigenous World 2023: Costa Rica. IWGIA.
https://www.iwgia.org/en/costa-rica/5084-iw-2023-costa-rica.html
Education International (2012). Costa Rica: Public policy on Indigenous education needed.
https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/18601:costa-rica-public-policy-on-indigenous-education-needed
Efimoff, I., & Starzyk, K. (2023). The impact of education about historical and current injustices,
individual racism and systemic racism on anti‐Indigenous racism. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 53(7), 1542-1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2987
English, M. O., Dioso-Lopez, R., & Lawrence, S. A. (2021). Supporting learner social-emotional learning
and literacy in virtual environments. In Handbook of research on supporting social and emotional
development through literacy education (pp. 50–72). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-
7464-5.ch003
Ford, D. (2021). Paulo Freire’s centennial: Political pedagogy for revolutionary organizations.
https://www.hamptonthink.org/read/paulo-freires-centennial-political-pedagogy-for-revolutionary-
organizations
Forest Carbon Partnership (2023). Capacity building program for Indigenous Peoples and civil society.
https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/capacity-building-program
Fountain, A. (2023). Indigenous America in the Spanish language classroom. Georgetown University
Press.
Freire, P. (2014). Pedagogy of the oppressed (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
Goforth, A. N., Nichols, L. M., Sun, J., Violante, A. E., Brooke, E., Kusumaningsih, S., Howlett, R.,
Hogenson, D., & Graham, N. (2022). Cultural adaptation of an educator social-emotional learning
program to support Indigenous students. School Psychology Review, 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2144091
Gomes, A., & Dumont-Pena, É. (2023). Territorial learning and childcare practices: Exploring relations
between territory and care in the intercultural training of Indigenous educators in Brazil. Oxford Review
of Education, 49(4), 519 - 535. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2213885
Greenberg, M. T. (2023). Evidence for social and emotional learning in schools. Learning Policy
Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED630374
Ho, V., Tran, V., Nguyen, V., Phan, T., & Cao, T. (2023). The process of developing professional capacity
for teachers. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(3), 489–501.
https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4892
Indigenous Planet (2022). Integrating Indigenous Peoples into the NDC process through capacity
development. https://indigenousplanet.org/resources/country/costa-rica
Ixchíu, L. (2020). Complicity and silence taking land from Indigenous Peoples in Costa Rica. Cultural
Survival. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/complicity-and-silence-taking-land-indigenous-
peoples-costa-rica
Jacobs, J., & Haberlin, S. (2022). Transformative learning within an international teaching experience:
Developing as emerging culturally responsive teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 44(2), 104–122.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2021.1955774
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3434.
Jimenez, J., & Kabachnik, P. (2023). Indigenizing environmental sustainability curriculum and
pedagogy: confronting our global ecological crisis via Indigenous sustainabilities. Teaching in Higher
Education, 28, 1095-1107 https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2193666
John, K., & John, G. (2023). A review of Indigenous perspectives in animal biosciences. Annual Review
of Animal Biosciences, 11, 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935
Jones, S. M., & Doolittle, E. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning: Introducing the issue. Future of
Children, 27(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0000
Kovalenko, V. (2020). Personal socialization as a subject of psychological, pedagogical and
sociological research. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Luhansk National University. Pedagogical
Sciences, 7(338), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2020-7(338)-5-15
Kushwaha, R., & Singh, C. (2023). Building teacher capacity for inclusive education: A professional
development model using technology and UDL. IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and
Law, 2(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v2i2.499
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994a). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children.
Jossey-Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994b). What we can learn from multicultural education research. Educational
Leadership, 51(8), 22–26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ508261
Lancy, D. F. (2024). Learning without lessons: Pedagogy in Indigenous communities. Oxford University
Press.
Lawton, P. (2022). Paolo Freire's "Conscientization". RoSE–Research on Steiner Education, 13(1), 49–
65. http://rosejourn.com/index.php/rose/article/view/667
Legette, K. B., Hope, E. C., Harris, J., & Griffin, C. B. (2021). Integrating culturally relevant pedagogy with
teacher social and emotional competencies and capacities training to support racially minoritized
students. In Motivating the SEL field forward through equity (Vol. 21, pp. 99–112). Emerald Publishing
Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320210000021007
Liando, N. V. F. & Tatipang, D. P. (2024). Embracing diversity: Culturally responsive curriculum and
inclusive pedagogical practices. Novateur Publications, 9–18.
http://novateurpublication.org/index.php/np/article/view/261
Maenette K.P., Nee-Benham, A., & Guajardo, F. (2017). The foundational partnership: Learning from the
voices of our elders. In Nee, M. K. A. P. A. (Ed.), Indigenous educational models for contemporary
practice: In our mother's voice, Volume II. Routledge.
Mahfouz, J., & Anthony-Stevens, V. (2020). Why trouble SEL? The need for cultural relevance in SEL.
Occasional Paper Series, 2020(43), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.58295/2375-3668.1354
Maravalle, A., & González Pandiella, A. (2023). Improving the quality and efficiency of education and
training in Costa Rica to better support growth and equity. OECD Economics Department Working
Papers, No. 1758, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2367677a-en.
Marín Herrera, M., Soto Lugo, V., Solano Ulate, S., & Barboza Leitón, I. (2020). Prácticas culturales
boruca y su relación con las costas del Pacífico Sur de Costa Rica. Trama, Revista De Ciencias Sociales
Y Humanidades., 9(2), 167–205. https://doi.org/10.18845/tramarcsh.v9i2.5571
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3435.
Matafwali, B., & Mofu, M. (2023). Exploring the feasibility of outdoor indigenous games and songs to
enhance play-based pedagogy in early childhood education. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society,
4(3), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638x.202343270
Meliqulova, M. X. (2024). Differences between teacher-centered and student-centered
approaches. Scientific Aspects and Trends in the Field of Scientific Research, 1(10), 281-283.
https://interonconf.org/index.php/pol/article/view/5280/4632
Mendecka, K. (2023). The right to mother tongue education for Indigenous Peoples: An overview of
international and regional standards. Studia Juridica, 96, 208-231. https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-
3135.si.2023-96.11
Minority Rights Group International (2022). Minority and indigenous people in Costa Rica: Afro-Costa
Ricans. https://minorityrights.org/minorities/afro-costa-ricans/
Nickerson, C. (2024). Understanding socialization in sociology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/socialization.html
Núñez, M., Duran, Y., Mojica, Z., & Stewart, M.A. (2020). Descubriendo los recursos culturales de
estudiantes indígenas Latinoamericanos a través de la literatura [Discovering the cultural resources of
Latin American Indigenous students through literature]. Journal of Latinos & Education, 23(2), 63–72.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2020.1842742
Pal, S., & Sarkar, P. (2023). Need for incorporation of Indigenous values in modern education system.
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(5), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.6377
Pamungkas, S., Suputra, G., Fadillah, D., Rista, M., & Arisandi, S. (2023). The urgency of preserving
regional languages through local educational curriculum. Foremost Journal, 4(2).
https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v4i2.3731
Peter, O. M. (2024). Paulo Freire's idea of liberal education and critical consciousness: An
exposition. Oracle of Wisdom Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs (OWIJOPPA), 8(1), 46–56.
https://acjol.org/index.php/owijoppa/article/view/4552/4424
Popielarz, K. (2024). “Change your approach”: How youth organizers, adult allies, and teacher
candidates engage in the praxis of community-based pedagogy within teacher education. International
Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(1), 190 - 212.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2035454
Porter, J. M., & Morrison, A. R. (2024). From pilots to policies: Challenges for implementing intercultural
bilingual education in Latin America. International Review of Education, 70, 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10039-5
Quirós, D., Ulloa, D., Murillo, C., Fernández, O., Chaves, L., Porras, S., Barr, S., León, J., Schumacher, C.,
Porras, L., T., E., & Mora, A. (2023). Costa Rica 2050: Tales of change.
https://doi.org/10.18235/0004679
Rigney, L. I. (2020). Aboriginal child as knowledge producer: Bringing into dialogue Indigenist
epistemologies and culturally responsive pedagogies for schooling. In Routledge handbook of critical
Indigenous studies (pp. 578-590). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440229
Rodriguez, A. J., & Navarro-Camacho, M. (2022). Exposing the invisibility of marginalized groups in
Costa Rica and promoting pre-service science teachers' critical positional praxis. In Equity in STEM
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3436.
education research: Advocating for equitable attention (pp. 125-146). Cham: Springer International
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08150-7_7
Rodriguez, A. J., & Navarro-Camacho, M. (2023). Claiming your own identity and positionality: The first
steps toward establishing equity and social justice in science education. Education Sciences, 13(7),
652. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070652
Sajat, N., Isa, M., Hassan, Z., Vincent, M., & Buba, B. (2023). Strategies for addressing Indigenous
education dropout. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(11), e002600.
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i11.2600
Samacá Bohórquez, Y. (2020). A self-dialogue with the thoughts of Paulo Freire: A critical pedagogy
encounter. HOW, 27(1), 125-139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1242985
Schroeder, M., Tourigny, E., Bird, S., Ottmann, J., Jeary, J., Mark, D., Kootenay, C., Graham, S., &
McKeough, A. (2022). Supporting Indigenous children’s oral storytelling using a culturally referenced,
developmentally based program. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 51(2).
https://doi.org/10.55146/ajie.v51i2.50
Selby, S. T., Cruz, A. R., Ardoin, N. M., & Durham, W. H. (2020). Community-as-pedagogy: Environmental
leadership for youth in rural Costa Rica. Environmental Education Research, 26(11), 1594–1620.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1792415
Soler-Gallart, M. (2023). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 50th-anniversary edition. International Review of
Education, 69, 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09992-y
Solis-Aguilar, D., Elizondo, L., & Elizondo, A. (2022). The Conservation of Maleku People's Sacred Natural
Sites in Costa Rica. In Religion and nature conservation (pp. 71-85). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246190
Song, M. (2023). Inequality and discrimination of Indigenous People and their culture. Communications
in Humanities Research, 4, 505–510. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/4/20220780
Spears, R. (2020). Social influence and group identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 367–390.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070620-111818
Sun, J., Goforth, A., Nichols, L., Violante, A., Christopher, K., Howlett, R., Hogenson, D., & Graham, N.
(2022). Building a space to dream: Supporting Indigenous children's survivance through community‐
engaged social and emotional learning. Child Development, 93(3), 699–716.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13786
Tafjord, B. O. (2020). Translating indigeneities: Educative encounters in Talamanca, Tromsø, and
elsewhere. In Indigenous religion (s) (pp. 21-58). Routledge.
The World Bank (2019). Languages at risk in Latin America and the Caribbean.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/infographic/2019/02/22/lenguas-indigenas-legado-en-extincion
Tichnor-Wagner, A. (2020). Becoming a globally competent school leader. ASCD.
United Nations Children’s Fund - UNICEF (2019). Country office annual report 2019: Costa Rica.
https://www.unicef.org/media/90491/file/Costa-Rica-2019-COAR.pdf
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, agosto, 2024, Volumen V, Número 4 p 3437.
Valenzuela, C. G. (2023). Disrupting curricula and pedagogies in Latin American universities: Six criteria
for decolonising the university. In Possibilities and Complexities of Decolonising Higher Education (pp.
133-151). Routledge.
Valls-Carol, R., Rodrigues de Mello, R., Rodríguez-Oramas, A., Khalfaoui, A., Roca-Campos, E., Guo, M., &
Redondo, G. (2022). The critical pedagogy that transforms the reality. International Journal of Sociology
of Education, 11(1), 58–71. https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/rise/article/view/8900
Villalobos-Araya, A. (2020). Strengthening community leadership capacities for local development
management in the Huetar Norte Region. Comunicación, 29(1), 4-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/rc.v29i1-2020.5255
Villhauer, B. (2021). Transforming REDD+ for Indigenous rights in Costa Rica. Local
Environment, 26(10), 1221-1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1972953
Wallerstein, C. (2010). CultureShock! Costa Rica: A survival guide to customs and etiquette. Marshall
Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.
Wang, D. (2023). Integrating Indigenous epistemologies into mainstream foreign language teaching.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.22039.wan
Warbrick, I., Heke, D., & Breed, M. (2023). Indigenous knowledge and the microbiome—Bridging the
disconnect between colonized places, peoples, and the unseen influences that shape our health and
well-being. mSystems, 8(1), e00875-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00875-22
Wei, X. (2023). How educational intercultural bilingualism has shaped Indigenous People language
learning in Mexico: Decolonial challenges. Journal of Language Teaching, 3(3), 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.003
Wodon, Q., & Cosentino, G. (2019). Education, language, and indigenous peoples. Education for Global
Development. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/education/education-language-and-indigenous-peoples
Zamzuri, N., Hanafiah, M., Suzila, T., Nor, N., & Rosnan, H. (2023). The connection between missing
school and Indigenous community: Challenges and complexities. AlterNative: An International Journal
of Indigenous Peoples, 19(3), 725 - 730. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801231188015
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, publicados en este sitio está
disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons .