Burnout Syndrome and its Influence on the Quality of Life of  
University Educators  
El síndrome de burnout y su influencia en la calidad de vida de los docentes  
universitarios  
Claudia Yasmín Pérez Rodríguez  
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia UNAD  
Neiva Colombia  
Daniela Fernanda Hueso Garzón  
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia UNAD  
Neiva Colombia  
Diana Paola Montealegre Suárez  
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia UNAD  
Neiva Colombia  
Artículo recibido: 27 de diciembre de 2025. Aceptado para publicación: 30 de abril de 2026.  
Conflictos de Interés: Ninguno que declarar.  
Abstract  
The objective of this study was to identify the presence of Burnout Syndrome and its influence on the  
quality of life of university educators in Colombia. A quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational  
design was developed, with a sample of 462 educators to whom the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)  
and the WHOQOL-BREF instruments were applied to measure the level of Burnout and quality of life,  
respectively. It was found that 55.8% of the educators presented a medium level of Burnout, 29.2% a  
high level, and 14.9% a low level. Emotional exhaustion was the most affected dimension (40.3% at a  
high level), followed by depersonalization (27.9%) and low personal accomplishment (25.3%). A strong  
relationship was found between Burnout and work-related variables such as longer tenure, more  
weekly working hours, and less rest time (p < 0.05). Likewise, educators with high levels of Burnout  
reported a significantly lower quality of life, especially in the dimensions of psychological health and  
work environment. The findings confirm that work overload and precarious institutional conditions  
increase the risk of Burnout, negatively affecting the physical, mental, and social well-being of  
educators. However, a high perception of personal accomplishment acts as a protective factor against  
professional exhaustion. It is recommended to implement institutional strategies that promote the  
prevention of Burnout and the promotion of educator well-being.  
Keywords: mental health, educators, psychological exhaustion, depersonalization  
Resumen  
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar la presencia del síndrome de Burnout y su influencia  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2033.  
en la calidad de vida de los docentes universitarios en Colombia. Se desarrolló un diseño cuantitativo,  
transversal y correlacional, con una muestra de 462 docentes a los cuales se les aplicaron los  
instrumentos Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) y WHOQOL-BREF para medir el nivel de Burnout y la  
calidad de vida, respectivamente. Se encontró que el 55,8 % de los docentes presentó un nivel medio  
de Burnout, el 29,2 % alto y el 14,9 % bajo. El cansancio emocional fue la dimensión más afectada (40,3  
% en nivel alto), seguida de la despersonalización (27,9 %) y la baja realización personal (25,3 %). Se  
encontró una fuerte relación entre el Burnout y variables laborales como mayor antigüedad, más horas  
de trabajo semanal y menor tiempo de descanso (p < 0,05). Asimismo, los docentes con altos niveles  
de Burnout reportaron una calidad de vida significativamente más baja, especialmente en las  
dimensiones de salud psicológica y ambiente laboral. Los hallazgos confirman que la sobrecarga  
laboral y las condiciones institucionales precarias incrementan el riesgo de Burnout, afectando  
negativamente el bienestar físico, mental y social de los docentes. Sin embargo, la alta percepción de  
realización personal actúa como un factor protector ante el desgaste profesional. Se recomienda  
implementar estrategias institucionales que fomenten la prevención del Burnout y la promoción del  
bienestar docente.  
Palabras clave: salud mental, docentes, agotamiento psicológico, despersonalización  
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades,  
publicado en este sitio está disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons.  
Cómo citar: Pérez Rodríguez, C. Y., Hueso Garzón, D. F., & Montealegre Suárez, D. P. (2026). Burnout  
Syndrome and its Influence on the Quality of Life of University Educators. LATAM Revista  
Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 7 (2), 2032 2043.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2034.  
INTRODUCTION  
Burnout Syndrome is considered the physical and psychological exhaustion that a worker suffers as a  
consequence of his or her work activity, which is characterized by the presence of emotional  
exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal accomplishment (Üngüren, E. (2024).  
Emotional exhaustion is characterized by the presence of lack of energy, fatigue, and lack of work  
motivation, which are associated with personal problems and workload. Likewise, depersonalization  
triggers behaviors of anxiety, irritability, egocentrism, and demotivation, generally resulting from  
emotional detachment, while lack of personal accomplishment leads the worker to self-evaluate  
negatively and not feel satisfied with his or her performance at work (Salvagioni et al, 2021).  
This syndrome generates an increase in the levels of stress, physical fatigue, insomnia, and family  
problems, which undoubtedly have a direct impact on the worker and the companies where they work,  
since the quality of the service provided to clients can deteriorate due to these factors (Üngüren, E.  
(2024).  
In this sense, Burnout Syndrome associated with work is considered a health problem that can affect  
any worker, but particularly those whose activity is related to the care of human beings (De Hert, S,  
2020). Authors such as González et al. (2015) indicate that this syndrome is very prevalent among  
university educators due to permanent contact with people, work conditions, personal problems, among  
other occupational stress factors, which trigger a negative impact on the physical, mental, and social  
well-being of the worker.  
Shanafelt et al. (2021) indicate that educators are professionals exposed to intense and diverse  
occupational stressors, which in many cases lead them to develop Burnout Syndrome. In fact, the  
disease has become a phenomenon of epidemic dimensions and character within this professional  
category.  
Authors such as González et al. (2015) indicate that university educators present wear and exhaustion  
as a result of their work, showing a very high emotional exhaustion compared to other components,  
such as the progressive loss of energy, emotional instability, fatigue and work exhaustion, demands  
from students with many needs, which in turn are interrelated with the problems affecting society.  
For its part, the World Health Organization defines quality of life as the way in which the individual  
perceives the position he or she occupies in the cultural environment and in the value system in which  
he or she lives, as well as in relation to his or her objectives, expectations, criteria, and concerns. All of  
this is influenced, of course, by physical health, psychological state, degree of independence, social  
relationships, environmental factors, and personal beliefs.  
In this sense, work-related quality of life is a variable strongly related to the quality of work performance.  
Workers with a better quality of life make more effort, show greater commitment to their work, and tend  
to perceive greater managerial support. On the other hand, workers with low quality of life show less  
effort and low reward. In this domain, perceiving insufficient reward was a determining factor in the low  
quality of life perceived by the worker, which is manifested in dissatisfaction with the support received  
from friends and with personal relationships in general (Salgado-Roa & Leria, 2018).  
Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify the presence of Burnout Syndrome and its influence  
on the quality of life of university educators in Colombia.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2035.  
METHODOLOGY  
Participants  
A quantitative, cross-sectional study with a correlational scope and non-experimental design was  
developed. The population consisted of university educators from Colombia, linked to different  
academic programs of higher education institutions. The final sample consisted of 462 educators,  
selected through non-probabilistic convenience sampling.  
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria  
Educators with an active employment contract at the time of data collection, with at least six months  
of experience at the institution, were included. Educators on extended leave, medical disability, or those  
who did not voluntarily agree to participate were excluded.  
Instruments  
For data collection, the following standardized and validated instruments were used:  
Burnout Syndrome: To measure burnout syndrome in this study, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)  
was used. This instrument evaluates three clearly defined dimensions: emotional exhaustion (9 items),  
depersonalization (5 items), and personal accomplishment (8 items). This tool is widely recognized and  
considered the de facto standard in burnout research due to its extensive validation and systematic  
use in international studies (Al-Ansari, H., & Ahmed, R; 2025) (Montealegre Suárez DP, et al; 2025)  
Fernández, G., & Valdez, M. (2019) González-Serrano, P., & Molina, J. (2021).  
Quality of Life: To measure this variable, the WHOQOL-BREF was used, which is a generic instrument  
derived from the WHOQOL-100. It consists of 26 items, 24 of which generate a quality of life profile in  
four dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.  
Ethical Aspects  
The research complied with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Resolution 8430 of  
1993. Confidentiality, anonymity, voluntariness, and the right to withdraw from the study at any time  
were guaranteed. In addition, the project was reviewed and approved by an institutional ethics  
committee.  
Data Analysis  
The data were analyzed using the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics v.26, employing measures  
of central tendency and correlation with significance levels of p<0.05.  
RESULTS  
Table 1  
Association between the dimensions of Burnout Syndrome in university educators  
Dimension  
Global Burnout  
Emotional Exhaustion  
Depersonalization  
Low (n, %)  
69 (14,9 %)  
186 (40,3 %)  
129 (27,9 %)  
117 (25,3 %)  
Medium (n, %)  
258 (55,8 %)  
90 (19,5 %)  
204 (44,2 %)  
120 (26,0 %)  
High (n, %)  
135 (29,2 %)  
186 (40,3 %)  
129 (27,9 %)  
225 (48,7 %)  
χ²  
p
6,24  
5,71  
4,95  
7,12  
0,04*  
0,03*  
0,04*  
0,02*  
Personal Accomplishment  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2036.  
Source: own elaboration.  
In global burnout, most participants were located at the medium level (55.8%), followed by high (29.2%)  
and low (14.9%), with a statistically significant difference (χ² = 6.24; p = 0.04). Regarding emotional  
exhaustion, a balanced distribution is observed between the low (40.3%) and high (40.3%) levels, with  
the medium level being the least frequent (19.5%) (χ² = 5.71; p = 0.03). For depersonalization, the  
medium level predominates (44.2%), followed by the low and high levels (both 27.9%) (χ² = 4.95; p =  
0.04). Finally, in personal accomplishment, almost half of the educators (48.7%) are located at the high  
level, indicating an adequate sense of achievement, while the medium (26.0%) and low (25.3%) levels  
present similar proportions (χ² = 7.12; p = 0.02).  
Graphic 1  
Distribution of the dimensions of Burnout Syndrome according to type of employment contract  
Source: own elaboration.  
Regarding emotional exhaustion, 45% of adjunct educators are located at the high level, compared to  
30% of part-time educators and 39% of full-time educators. At the low level, full-time educators stand  
out with 39%, while adjunct educators reach 36%. With respect to depersonalization, the medium levels  
predominate among part-time (44%) and full-time (46%) educators, while 32% of adjunct educators are  
concentrated at the low level. Finally, in personal accomplishment, full-time educators present the  
highest percentage at the high level (47%), followed by part-time educators (39%) and adjuncts (36%).  
In this sense, full-time educators show greater well-being and sense of accomplishment, while adjunct  
educators exhibit higher emotional exhaustion.  
Table 2  
Work-related variables according to the level of Burnout in university educators  
Burnout level  
Seniority (years, M±SD)  
Weekly working hours  
(M±SD)  
Daily rest time (M±SD)  
High  
Medium  
Low  
6,3 ± 5,6  
5,4 ± 4,5  
5,5 ± 3,0  
48,7 ± 2,9  
44,3 ± 2,7  
40,3 ± 2,7  
6,4 ± 1,2  
6,8 ± 1,4  
6,1 ± 1,0  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2037.  
F (ANOVA)  
p
6,31**  
0,001*  
10,21**  
0,000*  
2,03**  
0,04*  
Note: One-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05; **Levene statistic.  
Source: own elaboration.  
The analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences between the levels of Burnout and  
work-related variables. Educators with high Burnout reported a higher average seniority (6.3 years), a  
considerably greater number of weekly working hours (48 h), and less daily rest time (6.4 h). In contrast,  
those who presented low Burnout reported a lower weekly workload (40.3 h) and longer rest periods.  
These findings show that work overload and teaching seniority are factors directly associated with the  
increase of Burnout Syndrome (see Table 2).  
Table 3  
Correlations between work-related variables and dimensions of Burnout in university educators  
Variables  
Seniority  
1
,834**  
,246*  
,053  
,667**  
,616**  
,156*  
Working hours  
,834**  
1
Rest time  
,246*  
,012  
Seniority  
Working hours  
Rest time  
Emotional exhaustion  
Depersonalization  
Personal accomplishment  
Global Burnout  
,012  
1
,947**  
,966**  
,471*  
,364*  
,367*  
,401*  
,976**  
,716**  
Note: Pearson correlations. *p < 0.01; p < 0.05  
Source: own elaboration.  
The correlation analysis showed statistically significant relationships between work-related variables  
and the dimensions of Burnout Syndrome. A very strong positive correlation was found between  
working hours and emotional exhaustion (r = 0.947; p < 0.01), as well as between working hours and  
depersonalization (r = 0.966; p < 0.01). Similarly, global Burnout showed significant correlations with  
working hours (r = 0.716; p < 0.01) and with rest time (r = 0.976; p < 0.01), indicating that a higher number  
of working hours and less rest time considerably increase the risk of Burnout. On the other hand,  
seniority was also positively related to depersonalization (r = 0.667; p < 0.01) and personal  
accomplishment (r = 0.616; p < 0.01), suggesting that although experience can increase professional  
motivation, it also exposes educators to greater emotional exhaustion (see Table 3).  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2038.  
Graphic 2  
Levels of quality of life according to the WHOQOL-BREF  
Source: own elaboration.  
Regarding quality of life, measured by the WHOQOL-BREF, a predominant deterioration was observed  
in the dimensions of psychological health and work environment, where 42.2% and 40.9% of educators,  
respectively, reported low levels. In the physical health dimension, 35.1% reported problems related to  
fatigue, muscle pain, and sleep disorders, while only 18.2% reached high scores. Social relationships  
were mainly located at medium levels (45.5%), although one third of educators (33.1%) reported  
dissatisfaction with their personal relationships. These results reflect that the overall perception of  
quality of life among university educators is predominantly medium-low, with special affectation in  
psychological health and work environment (see Figure 2).  
Table 4  
Relationship between the level of Burnout and quality of life in university educators  
Burnout  
Level  
High quality  
life n (%)  
of  
Medium quality of life  
n (%)  
Low quality of life  
n (%)  
Total n  
(%)  
Low  
38 (25,2 %)  
29 (16,9 %)  
16 (11,4 %)  
83 (18,0 %)  
22,29  
89 (58,6 %)  
25 (16,2 %)  
151 (100  
%)  
152 (100  
%)  
141 (100  
%)  
462 (100  
%)  
Medium  
High  
84 (57,7 %)  
64 (45,7 %)  
237 (61,1 %)  
39 (25,4 %)  
61 (42,9 %)  
125 (27,1 %)  
p < 0,001  
Total  
χ² (gl = 4)  
V = 0,16  
Source: own elaboration.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2039.  
Graphic 5  
Relationship between the level of Burnout and quality of life according to the WHOQOL-BREF in university  
educators  
Source: own elaboration.  
Table 4 and graphic 5 show a significant relationship between the level of Burnout and quality of life  
among the 462 educators evaluated (χ² = 22.29; df = 4; p < 0.001; V = 0.16). It is observed that educators  
with high levels of Burnout more frequently present low quality of life (42.9%), while those with low  
levels of Burnout are mainly associated with medium quality of life (58.6%).  
DISCUSION  
The results show that the population of university educators in Colombia is characterized by a balanced  
participation between men and women, with a predominance of intermediate ages (3145 years). This  
profile coincides with research indicating that university teaching tends to be concentrated in stages  
of consolidated professional development, associated with postgraduate education and significant  
experience (Mantai & Marrone, 2023). However, the high proportion of fixed-term contracts and work  
overload exceeding 40 hours per week reflect a precariousness of academic employment, which  
constitutes a risk factor for the physical and mental health of teaching staff (Giorgi et al., 2020).  
The finding that approximately 40% of participants present high levels of emotional exhaustion  
confirms the literature identifying this dimension as the most prevalent aspect of Burnout in  
educational contexts. The administrative workload, together with the multiplicity of roles, is evidenced  
as a trigger for emotional exhaustion. Although depersonalization shows a lower prevalence, its  
manifestation implies a risk for pedagogical quality, as it can generate attitudes of detachment toward  
students and colleagues (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2010).  
A paradoxical finding is the coexistence of high levels of emotional exhaustion with high personal  
accomplishment (49%). This suggests that, despite exhaustion, educators maintain motivation and a  
sense of purpose, which agrees with what was reported by Răducu et al., (2022), who indicate that self-  
realization can act as a protective factor against Burnout.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2040.  
The assessment of quality of life reveals deterioration in the dimensions of physical health,  
psychological health, and work environment. The presence of fatigue, sleep disorders, and  
musculoskeletal pain is consistent with studies that highlight the direct relationship between working  
conditions and health problems among educators (Fahmy et al., 2022; Sánchez-Narváez et al., 2023).  
In the environmental domain, 41% reported negative perceptions regarding infrastructure and  
resources, which aligns with evidence showing that low job resources and unfavorable school context  
conditions are associated with higher levels of teacher burnout (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2020). Although  
social relationships did not present the most critical levels, the dissatisfaction reported by one third of  
the educators suggests isolation and weakened support networks factors that are consistently linked  
to higher burnout risk (Einav et al., 2024)  
The correlations found confirm the close relationship between Burnout and quality of life. The strong  
negative correlation between emotional exhaustion and psychological health (r = -0.68) reinforces what  
was described by Maslach and Leiter, who argue that exhaustion is the most direct predictor of  
deterioration in mental health. Similarly, the association between depersonalization and social  
relationships (r = -0.55) shows how emotional disconnection from students and colleagues deteriorates  
the interpersonal sphere (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2010).  
On the other hand, the positive relationship between personal accomplishment and overall quality of  
life (r = 0.61) highlights the protective role of motivation and sense of achievement, in line with studies  
emphasizing self-realization as a buffer against occupational stress (Răducu et al., 2022). This finding  
underscores the importance of promoting strategies aimed at recognition and the strengthening of  
educators’ professional identity.  
The findings suggest the urgent need to implement institutional policies focused on Burnout prevention  
and quality of life promotion. Interventions such as reducing administrative workload, implementing  
self-care programs, and strengthening social support networks have proven effective in mitigating  
educator exhaustion. Furthermore, recognition and appreciation of the teaching role must be  
reinforced, as they enhance motivation and personal accomplishment, acting as protective factors  
against work-related stress.  
CONCLUSION  
A significant proportion of educators presented high levels of emotional exhaustion and, to a lesser  
extent, depersonalization, which negatively affect their psychological health, interpersonal  
relationships, and overall quality of life, particularly in the physical and environmental dimensions.  
However, a high perception of personal accomplishment was also identified, reflecting that, despite  
exhaustion and adverse working conditions, many maintain motivation and a sense of professional  
purpose, constituting a protective factor. Taken together, the findings indicate that the Burnout  
syndrome is notably present in this group and is closely associated with the deterioration of quality of  
life, highlighting the need to implement institutional strategies aimed at prevention, the promotion of  
educator well-being, and the strengthening of healthy work environments.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2041.  
REFERENCES  
Agyapong, V. I. O., Osei, A., McLoughlin, D., & Jahn, H. J. (2023). Impact of teacher burnout on empathy  
and classroom environment: A cross-national study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 342–  
Al-Ansari, H., & Ahmed, R. (2025). Burnout and well-being among higher education teachers: Influencing  
De Hert, S. (2020). Burnout in healthcare workers: Prevalence, impact and preventative strategies. Local  
and Regional Anesthesia, 13, 171183. https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S240564  
Einav, M., Confino, D., Geva, N., & Margalit, M. (2024). Teachers’ Burnout – The Role of Social Support,  
Gratitude, Hope, Entitlement and Loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology.  
Fahmy, V. F., Momen, M. A. M. T., Mostafa, N. S., & Elawady, M. Y. (2022). Prevalence, risk factors and  
quality of life impact of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among school teachers in Cairo, Egypt.  
Fernández, G., & Valdez, M. (2019). Burnout syndrome in school teachers and university professors: A  
comparative  
study.  
International  
Education  
Studies,  
12(9),  
7180.  
Giorgi, G., Lecca, L. I., Alessio, F., Finstad, G. L., Bondanini, G., Lulli, L. G., Arcangeli, G., & Mucci, N. (2020).  
COVID-19-related mental health effects in the workplace: A narrative review. International Journal of  
Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7857.  
González, M., Ortiz, R., & García, J. (2015). Síndrome de Burnout en docentes universitarios: Un estudio  
correlacional. Revista Salud y Trabajo, 22(2), 2130.  
González, R., Pérez, L., & Vargas, A. (2015). Burnout en personal docente del área de enfermería. Revista  
Colombiana de Psicología, 24(1), 8598.  
González-Serrano, P., & Molina, J. (2021). Study of the prevalence of burnout in university professors in  
Mantai, L., & Marrone, M. (2023). Academic career progression from early career researcher to  
professor: what can we learn from job ads. Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 797812.  
Montealegre Suárez DP, Camargo Valderrama MA, Salazar Rojas DM, Cerón Polanco MC, Pérez  
CY, Hueso Garzón DF. Burnout syndrome associated with occupational characteristics of health  
workers. Med Segur Trab (Internet). 2025;71(280):177-185. https://doi.org/10.4321/s0465-  
546x2025000300003  
Răducu, C. M., Onișor, I. M., & Velea, L. (2022). Personality and sociodemographic variables in teacher  
burnout: A latent profile analysis of HEXACO factors. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 18581.  
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2042.  
Salgado-Roa, J. A., & Leria, F. J. (2018). Síndrome de burnout y calidad de vida profesional percibida  
según estilos de personalidad en profesores de educación primaria. CES Psicología, 11(1), 6989.  
Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. (2021).  
Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review. PLoS  
Sánchez-Narváez, F., Velasco-Orozco, J. J., & Pérez-Archundia, E. (2023). Burnout Syndrome and Sleep  
Quality in Basic Education Teachers in Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Research and  
Shanafelt, T. D., Ripp, J., & Trockel, M. (2020). Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety among  
health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA, 323(21), 21332134.  
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations.  
Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 10591069.  
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher burnout: relations between dimensions of burnout,  
perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. A longitudinal study. Teachers  
Üngüren, E. (2024). The effects of job stress on burnout and turnover intention: Organizational  
outcomes  
including  
quality  
of  
service.  
Behavioral  
Sciences,  
14(4),  
322.  
Todo el contenido de LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, publicados en este  
sitio está disponibles bajo Licencia Creative Commons  
.
LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Asunción, Paraguay.  
ISSN en línea: 2789-3855, abril, 2026, Volumen VII, Número 2 p 2043.