Rights of nature, defense and warranty; legal and social analysis in communities of Azuay

Derechos de la naturaleza, defensa y garantías; análisis jurídico y social en comunidades del Azuay

Autores/as

  • Fernanda Yadira Ramírez Álvarez Universidad de Cuenca
  • Teodoro Verdugo Universidad de Cuenca
  • Fabián Cordero Universidad de Cuenca
  • Paola Gómez Universidad de Cuenca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i1.1843

Palabras clave:

environmental conflicts, debate, rights of citizen, social participation

Resumen

The study in seven communities in the province of Azuay in Ecuador, had goal determining the knowledge of populations of rights of nature, citizen participation, social control and if there are infringement of this, analyzed legally and socially the rights of participation in relationship with rights of Nature enforcement and guarantee, the rights of participation as an element necessary for effective compliance of rights of nature, through quantitative and qualitative analysis. The majority of population considers that they know about rights, four of the communities do not that these rights are enshrined in the Constitution, it is meaning that they do know, generate a limiting for reach the defense it. It found the necessity to educate for protect and defend the rights of nature, to know the rights, as a requirement of the defense for the appropriation of the norms and participation tools, as a citizen

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Fernanda Yadira Ramírez Álvarez, Universidad de Cuenca

Teodoro Verdugo, Universidad de Cuenca

Fabián Cordero, Universidad de Cuenca

Citas

Acosta, A. (2011). La naturaleza con derechos: de la filosofía a la política. Revista Polis.

Astudillo, J. (2018). Propuestas alternativas a la minería en Río Blanco – Ecuador. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, 139-151.

Brei, A. (2013). Rights & Nature. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics.

Burdon, P. (2011). The Rights of Nature: Reconsidered. University of Adelaide Law School.

Centeno, L. (2019). La Tutela Judicial Efectiva de los Derechos de la Naturaleza en Ecuador a partir de la promulgación de la Constitución de 2008. Guayaquil: UEES.

Centeno, R. (2019). La Tutela Judicial Efectiva de los Derechos de la Naturaleza en Ecuador a partir de la promulgación de la Constitución de 2008. Guayaquil: UEES.

Chale, T. (22 de April de 2021). Columbia Climate School, Climate Earth and Society. Obtenido de State of Planet : https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/04/22/rights-of-nature-lawsuits/

Chicaiza, G. (2009). ¿Estado Constitucional de Derechos? Informe de Deerechos Humanos 2009. Quito: Abya Ayala.

Fontaine, G. (2018). Explaining public accountability deficit in extractive policies: The Ecuadorian case. The Extractive Industries and Society, 190-200.

Galiano, G., Morffi, C., Bravo, I., & Marriot, G. (2023). Citizen participation: essential foundation of democracy in Ecuador. Revista Uniandes.

Global Alliance for the Rigths of Nature. (28 de november de 2022). Global Alliance for the Rigths of Nature. Obtenido de https://www.garn.org/rights-of-nature/

Grefa, C. (2021). Derechos de la naturaleza y extractivismo minero: una evaluación de las contradicciones en Ecuador. Quito, EC: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.

Gudynas, E. (2009). La ecología política del giro biocéntrico en la nueva Constitución de Ecuador. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 34-47.

Guy Peters, B., Fontaine, G., & Mendez, J. (2018). Substance and Methods in the Comparative Study of Policy Change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practices, 133-141.

Karmen, A. (1992). Who's against Victims' Rights-The Nature of the Opposition to Pro-victim Initiatives in Criminal Justice. HeinOnline.

Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2016). Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail. World Development, 130-142.

Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2017). Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail. World Development, 1-13.

Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2018). Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US, Ecuador, and New Zealand. Global Environmental Politics.

Kauffman, C., & Martin, P. (2021). Scaling up Buen Vivir: Globalizing Local Environmental Governance from Ecuador. Global Environmental Politics , 40-58.

Kotzé, L., & P., V. (2017). Somewhere between Rhetoric and Reality: Environmental Constitutionalism and the Rights of Nature in Ecuador. Transnational Environmental Law.

Kunh, R. (2011). No Todo Lo Que Brilla Es Oro conflictos socio ambientales alrededor de dos proyectos de minería a gran escala en el Ecuador. Quito: Universidad Andina.

Lalander, R. (2014). Rights of Nature and the Indigenous Peoples in Bolivia and Ecuador: A Straitjacket for Progressive Development Politics? Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 3, No.2 , 148-172.

Martínez, E. (2010). PACHAMAMA Y SUMAK KAWSAI. ADG-N Libros.

Maser, C., & De Silva, L. (2019). Resolving Environmental Conflicts Principles and Concepts, Third Edition. Taylor and Francis Group.

Mendez, Y. (2011). El derecho y su correlación con los camboios en la sociedad. Derecho y Cambio Social.

Morales, M. (2013). Derechos de la Naturaleza en la Constitución Ecuatoriana. Justicia Ambiental, 77-80.

Naranjo, M. (2016). Derechos de la Naturaleza y la Gestión de la Defensoría del Pueblo. Quito: FLACSO.

Naranjo, M. (2016). DERECHOS DE LA NATURALEZA Y LA GESTIÓN DE LA DEFENSORÍA DEL PUEBLO DE ECUADOR . Quito: FLACSO.

Nash, R. F. (1989). The Rigths of Nature. a history of enviromental ethics.

Palgrave Macmillan, C. (2022). Social Change in Relation to Extractivism and Social-Environmental Conflicts in Peru. En D. Sussman, The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change (págs. 1-18).

Paño, P., Rébola, R., & Suárez, M. (2018). Procesos y Metodologías Participativas Reflexiones y experiencias para la transformación social. CLACSO.

Pérez, M. (2019). La participación ciudadana de los movimientos socioambientales en América Latina. Rev. Colom. Soc., 135-156.

Perrealt, T., Bridge, G., & McCarthy, J. (2015). THE ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF POLITICAL ECOLOGY . New York: British Library .

Pietari, K. (2016). Ecuador’s Constitutional Rights of Nature: Implementation, Impacts, and Lessons Learned. WILLAMETTE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JOURNAL , 1-58.

Pietari, K. (2016). Ecuador’s Constitutional Rights of Nature: Implementation, Impacts, and Lessons Learned. WILLAMETTE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JOURNAL, 37-93.

Raftopoulos, M. (2017). Contemporary debates on social-environmental conflicts, extractivism and human rights in Latin America. The International Journal of Human Rigths, 387-404.

Raftopoulos, M. (2017). Debates contemporáneos sobre conflictos socioambientales, extractivismo y derechos humanos en América Latina. Revista Internacionalo de D, 387-404.

Renée A. Irvin, J. S. (2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review.

Restrepo, A. (2020). Interculturalidad, Protección de la Naturaleza y construccón de paz. Rosario: Universidad de Rosario.

Svampa, & M. (2019). Neo-extractivism in Latin America Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Politics and Society in Latin America.

Tanasescu, M. (2013). The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 846-861.

Valladares, C., & Boelengs, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: governmentality, ‘convenient communities’ and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Enviroments Politicals, 1015-1034.

Valverde, A., Camarero, G., Ordoñez, S., Partucci, H., & Bojanich, L. (2015). Conflictos Socioambientales y Territoriales: propuestas teórico-metodológicas para su abordaje. Buenos Aires: XI Jornadas de Sociología. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.

Van Teijlingen, K., & Dupuits, E. (2021). Estrategias comunitarias frente a conflictos socioambientales: más allá de la resistencia. Quito: FLACSO.

Vazquez, L., Espinoza, M., & Eguiguren, M. (2016). PERCEPTION OF SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICTS IN MINING AREAS: THE CASE OF THE MIRADOR PROJECT IN ECUADOR. Ambiente y Sociedade.

Vela, D., & Torres, N. (2021). Consultation in Ecuador: Institutional Fragility and Participation in National Extractive Policy. Latin American Perspectives, 172-191.

Vivanco, L., Ordoñez, A., Pacurucu, N., & Orellana, B. (2022). Opportunities and challenges of citizen participation in the territorial planning system in Ecuador. En A. Maciejko, Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure (págs. 165-173).

Yoautt, R. (2017). Personhood and the Rights of Nature: The New Subjects of Contemporary Earth Politics. International Political Sociology.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-03-11

Cómo citar

Ramírez Álvarez, F. Y., Verdugo, T., Cordero, F., & Gómez, P. (2024). Rights of nature, defense and warranty; legal and social analysis in communities of Azuay: Derechos de la naturaleza, defensa y garantías; análisis jurídico y social en comunidades del Azuay. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5(1), 3344 – 3356. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i1.1843

Número

Sección

Artículos