Education with purpose: Student empowerment, an international perspective

Educación con propósito: Empoderamiento estudiantil, una perspectiva internacional

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2371

Palabras clave:

education, empowerment, students

Resumen

This scientific essay addresses the evolution of education, emphasizing the need to view the human being as a dynamic and multifaceted entity from birth to death. It focuses on the student as a critical pillar of the educational process, highlighting the importance of their philosophical inclusion to enhance the effectiveness of the educational system. The essay underscores the relevance of mobile devices in education, promoting teaching strategies that integrate technology to foster collaboration and interaction. The objective of the essay is to analyze the importance of purpose-driven education that empowers students and meets contemporary needs using technology. Good educational practices include encouraging student-faculty contact, developing reciprocity among students, using active learning techniques, giving prompt feedback, emphasizing time on task, communicating high expectations, and respecting diverse talents. These principles, along with contemporary educational technologies, create dynamic and interactive learning environments. Education has undergone significant transformations, adopting various methodologies to meet evolving needs. Empowering students within the educational process is crucial, enhancing their self-esteem, socialization, and sense of belonging. This empowerment fosters deeper interest and engagement in learning. Integrating empowerment into education cultivates leaders capable of leveraging various leadership styles, generating positive outcomes in academic, social, personal, and professional realms. Such leaders contribute to the well-rounded development of individuals and the overall betterment of society. By ensuring that students are empowered and well-prepared to lead and innovate, education can address complex contemporary problems and promote a harmonious and productive society. The essay concludes by emphasizing the necessity of empowering students in the educational process, improving their self-esteem, socialization, and sense of belonging. This empowerment fosters a deeper interest in learning and promotes a more engaging educational experience. Integrating empowerment into education prepares students for leadership roles, enabling them to generate positive outcomes in various aspects of life, thereby contributing to a more cohesive and progressive society.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Erick García Serna, Universidad Hipócrates

Edwin Yépez González, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, Cundinamarca

Yulissa Calderón Ávila, Universidad Hipócrates

Citas

Alvarado Barboza, M. A. (2023) Technological Tools to Develop Competences for the 21st Century: A Project to Empower Students in the English Teaching Major at UNED. Revista Espiga. 22(46); 91-108. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=467875680008

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bernstein, D. A. (2018). Does active learning work? A good question, but not the right one. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000124

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans, Green.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Cattaneo, K. H. (2017). Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.237

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3-7 (ED282491). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED282491

Dabbagh, D., Fake, H. & Zhang, Z. (2019) Student Perspectives of Techology use for Learning in Higher Education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22102

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.

Gastil, J. (1994). A definition and illustration of democratic leadership. Human Relations, 47(8), 953-975. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700805

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.

Guslyakova, A., Valeeva, N. & Veretennikova, L. (2021) Project-based learning usage in L2 teaching in a contemporary comprehensive school (on the example of English as a foreign language classroom). Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação. 14(43). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5702/570272348120/570272348120.pdf

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.

Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366

Lima, G. S. N., & Colares, M. L. I. S. (2023). Historical-critical pedagogy and integral education: reflections on emancipatory human training. Acta Scientiarum - Education, 45. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascieduc.v45i1.60501

López Calva, M. (2014). Ser persona y hacerse persona en el cambio de época: desafíos para la formación integral en la escuela y la universidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, XLIV (3), 61–81. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/270/27032150004.pdf

Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Merrill.

Spears, L. C. (1995). Reflections on Leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf's Theory of Servant Leadership Influenced Today's Top Management Thinkers. John Wiley & Sons.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. (1960). Autocracy and democracy: An experimental inquiry. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 119-120.

Woods, P. A. (2004). Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312032000154522

Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-07-15

Cómo citar

García Serna, E., Yépez González, E., & Calderón Ávila, Y. (2024). Education with purpose: Student empowerment, an international perspective: Educación con propósito: Empoderamiento estudiantil, una perspectiva internacional. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5(4), 1741 – 1751. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2371

Número

Sección

Ciencias de la Educación