Una revisión sistemática sobre los constructos empatía y teoría de la mente en adultos sanos
A systematic review of the constructs empathy and theory of mind in healthy adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i5.4631Palabras clave:
revisión sistemática, PRISMA, empatía, teoría de la mente, adultos sanosResumen
La Teoría de la Mente (ToM) y la empatía son habilidades fundamentales para una adecuada interacción social. Es común encontrar un entrecruzamiento conceptual entre ambos constructos que, si bien se relacionan, no son equivalentes. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática de los artículos publicados en inglés y español durante los años 2012 a 2022, que incluyan el estudio de la empatía y la ToM en adultos sanos, con el fin de esclarecer sus aspectos distintivos. Método y Resultados: Siguiendo los lineamientos PRISMA se encontraron inicialmente 33.662 artículos. Tras descartar duplicaciones y aplicar criterios de inclusión y calidad (evaluados por tres investigadores independientes) se seleccionaron finalmente 68 artículos, los cuales fueron clasificados en seis ejes temáticos diferentes. Se discuten resultados de los artículos encontrados, aclarando su diferenciación conceptual, operacional y neuroanatómica.Descargas
Citas
Aguirre-Loaiza, H., Duarte-Pulgarín, C. A., Grajales, L. D., Gärtner, M., García, D. Y., & Marín, N. G. (2020). Empatía y Teoría de la Mente: comparación entre deportistas y no deportistas. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi18-2.etmc
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). The power of emotional valence—from cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192
Arango Tobón, O., Clavijo Zapata, S., Puerta Lopera, I., & Sánchez Duque, J. (2014). Formación académica, valores, empatía y comportamientos socialmente responsables en estudiantes universitarios1. Revista De La Educación Superior, 43(169), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2015.01.003
Artinger, F., Exadaktylos, F., Koppel, H., & Sääksvuori, L. (2014). In Others’ Shoes: Do Individual Differences in Empathy and Theory of Mind Shape Social Preferences? PLoS ONE, 9(4), e92844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092844
Baez, S., Manes, F., Huepe, D., Torralva, T., Fiorentino, N., Richter, F., Huepe-Artigas, D., Ferrari, J., Montañes, P., Reyes, P., Matallana, D., Vigliecca, N. S., Decety, J., & Ibanez, A. (2014). Primary empathy deficits in frontotemporal dementia. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00262
Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., & Rietdijk, W. J. R. (2013). Theory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machiavellianism. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1760–1798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471393
Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
Basile, C., Lecce, S., & van Vugt, F. T. (2022). Synchrony During Online Encounters Affects Social Affiliation and Theory of Mind but Not Empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 886639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886639
Bek, J., Donahoe, B., & Brady, N. (2022). Feelings first? Sex differences in affective and cognitive processes in emotion recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(10), 1892–1903. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211064583
Bodden, M., Kübler, D., Knake, S., Menzler, K., Heverhagen, J., Sommer, J., Kalbe, E., Krach, S., & Dodel, R. (2013). Comparing the neural correlates of affective and cognitive theory of mind using fMRI: Involvement of the basal ganglia in affective theory of mind. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0129-6
Bruneau, E. G., Jacoby, N., & Saxe, R. (2015). Empathic control through coordinated interaction of amygdala, theory of mind and extended pain matrix brain regions. NeuroImage, 114, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.034
Campos, D., Modrego-Alarcón, M., López-del-Hoyo, Y., González-Panzano, M., Van Gordon, W., Shonin, E., Navarro-Gil, M., & García-Campayo, J. (2019). Exploring the Role of Meditation and Dispositional Mindfulness on Social Cognition Domains: A Controlled Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00809
Cheetham, M., Hänggi, J., & Jancke, L. (2014). Identifying with fictive characters: structural brain correlates of the personality trait ‘fantasy.’ Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1836–1844. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst179
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. En American Psychological Association, Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 10, 85-104. https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf
Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.
Di Tella, M., Adenzato, M., Catmur, C., Miti, F., Castelli, L., & Ardito, R. B. (2020). The role of alexithymia in social cognition: Evidence from a non-clinical population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.012
Di Tella, M., Miti, F., Ardito, R. B., & Adenzato, M. (2020). Social cognition and sex: Are men and women really different? Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 110045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110045
Dvash, J., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2014). Theory of Mind and Empathy as Multidimensional Constructs. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/tld.0000000000000040
Feeser, M., Fan, Y., Weigand, A., Hahn, A., Gärtner, M., Böker, H., Grimm, S., & Bajbouj, M. (2015). Oxytocin improves mentalizing – Pronounced effects for individuals with attenuated ability to empathize. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 53, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.12.015
Ferguson, H. J., Cane, J. E., Douchkov, M., & Wright, D. (2015). Empathy predicts false belief reasoning ability: evidence from the N400. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(6), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu131
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y. W., Warren, F., Howard, S., Ghinai, R., Fearon, P., & Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
Gutiérrez-Cobo, M. J., Cabello, R., Megías-Robles, A., Gómez-Leal, R., Baron-Cohen, S., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2023). Does our cognitive empathy diminish with age? The moderator role of educational level. International Psychogeriatrics, 35(4), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610221000624
Haas, B. W., Brook, M., Remillard, L., Ishak, A., Anderson, I. W., & Filkowski, M. M. (2015). I Know How You Feel: The Warm-Altruistic Personality Profile and the Empathic Brain. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0120639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120639
Hervé, P. Y., Razafimandimby, A., Jobard, G., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2013). A Shared Neural Substrate for Mentalizing and the Affective Component of Sentence Comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054400
Hildebrandt, M. K., Jauk, E., Lehmann, K., Maliske, L., & Kanske, P. (2021). Brain activation during social cognition predicts everyday perspective-taking: A combined fMRI and ecological momentary assessment study of the social brain. NeuroImage, 227, 117624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117624
Hu, Y., Scheele, D., Becker, B., Voos, G., David, B., Hurlemann, R., & Weber, B. (2016). The Effect of Oxytocin on Third-Party Altruistic Decisions in Unfair Situations: An fMRI Study. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20236
Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Baron-Cohen, S., Białaszek, W., Dopierała, A., Kozłowska, A., & Rymarczyk, K. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the ‘reading the mind in the eyes’ test with samples of different ages from a polish population. Studia Psychologica, 58(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2016.01.704
Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F. M., & Singer, T. (2015). Dissecting the social brain: Introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain–behavior relations for empathy and Theory of Mind. NeuroImage, 122, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082
Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F. M., Parianen Lesemann, F. H., & Singer, T. (2016). Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw052
Knyazev, G. G., Savostyanov, A. N., Bocharov, A. V., & Merkulova, E. A. (2018). Resting state connectivity mediates the relationship between collectivism and social cognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 123, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.12.002
Krause, L., Enticott, P. G., Zangen, A., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2012). The role of medial prefrontal cortex in theory of mind: A deep rTMS study. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.037
Lee, H. R., Nam, G., & Hur, J. W. (2020). Development and validation of the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0238309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238309
Lucas, P. J., Baird, J., Arai, L., Law, C., & Roberts, H. M. (2007). Worked examples of
alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in
systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-4
Mai, X., Zhang, W., Hu, X., Zhen, Z., Xu, Z., Zhang, J., & Liu, C. (2016). Using tDCS to Explore the Role of the Right Temporo-Parietal Junction in Theory of Mind and Cognitive Empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00380
Manfredi, M., Proverbio, A. M., Sanchez Mello de Pinho, P., Ribeiro, B., Comfort, W. E., Murrins Marques, L., & Boggio, P. S. (2020). Electrophysiological indexes of ToM and non-ToM humor in healthy adults. Experimental Brain Research, 238(4), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05753-7
McCrackin, S. D., Provencher, S., Mendell, E., & Ristic, J. (2022). Transparent masks reduce the negative impact of opaque masks on understanding emotional states but not on sharing them. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00411-8
McDonald, B., Böckler, A., & Kanske, P. (2022). Soundtrack to the social world: Emotional music enhances empathy, compassion, and prosocial decisions but not theory of mind. Emotion, 22(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001036
Melloni, M., Sedeño, L., Couto, B., Reynoso, M., Gelormini, C., Favaloro, R., Canales-Johnson, A., Sigman, M., Manes, F., & Ibanez, A. (2013). Preliminary evidence about the effects of meditation on interoceptive sensitivity and social cognition. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 9(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-47
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.
Olderbak, S., Wilhelm, O., Olaru, G., Geiger, M., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01503
Panzica, F., Schiaffi, E., Visani, E., Franceschetti, S., & Giovagnoli, A. R. (2019). Gamma electroencephalographic coherence and theory of mind in healthy subjects. Epilepsy & Behavior, 100, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.07.036
Perestelo-Pérez, L. (2013). Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews
in Psychology and Health. International Journal of Clinical and Health
Psychology, 13(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1697-2600(13)70007-3
Petrocchi, S., Filipponi, C., Antonietti, C., Levante, A., & Lecciso, F. (2020). Theory of Mind as a Mediator Between Emotional Trust Beliefs and Interpersonal Communication Competence in a Group of Young Adults. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120913489
Pires, J. G., Nunes, M. F. O., & Nunes, C. H. S. D. S. (2015). Instrumentos brasileños
basados en psicología positiva: revisión sistemática [Brazilian instruments based
on positive psychology: a systematic review]. Psico-USF, 20(2), 287-295.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200209
Prochnow, D., Brunheim, S., Steinhäuser, L., & Seitz, R. (2014). Reasoning about the implications of facial expressions: A behavioral and fMRI study on low and high social impact. Brain and Cognition, 90, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.07.004
Ramezani, A., Ghamari, M., Jafari, A., & Aghdam, G. F. (2019). The Effectiveness of a ToM Training Program in Promoting Empathy Between Married Couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1620145
Raz, G., Jacob, Y., Gonen, T., Winetraub, Y., Flash, T., Soreq, E., & Hendler, T. (2014). Cry for her or cry with her: context-dependent dissociation of two modes of cinematic empathy reflected in network cohesion dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst052
Redondo, I., & Herrero-Fernández, D. (2018). Adaptación del Empathy Quotient (EQ) en una muestra española. Terapia Psicológica, 36(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48082018000200081
Regenbogen, C., Schneider, D. A., Gur, R. E., Schneider, F., Habel, U., & Kellermann, T. (2012). Multimodal human communication — Targeting facial expressions, speech content and prosody. NeuroImage, 60(4), 2346–2356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.043
Reniers, R. L. E. P., Völlm, B. A., Elliott, R., & Corcoran, R. (2013). Empathy, ToM, and self–other differentiation: An fMRI study of internal states. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.861360
Reniers, R. L., Corcoran, R., Völlm, B. A., Mashru, A., Howard, R., & Liddle, P. F. (2012). Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009
Rodríguez, C., Montandon, M. L., Herrmann, F. R., Pegna, A. J., & Giannakopoulos, P. (2022). Cognitive and Emotional Determinants of Automatic Perspective Taking in Healthy Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883929
Sadeghi, S., Schmidt, S. N. L., Mier, D., & Hass, J. (2022). Effective connectivity of the human mirror neuron system during social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 17(8), 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab138
Schimmenti, A. (2015). Dissociative experiences and dissociative minds: Exploring a nomological network of dissociative functioning. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 17(3), 338–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2015.1108948
Schimmenti, A., Jonason, P. K., Passanisi, A., La Marca, L., Di Dio, N., & Gervasi, A. M. (2019). Exploring the Dark Side of Personality: Emotional Awareness, Empathy, and the Dark Triad Traits in an Italian Sample. Current Psychology, 38(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9588-6
Schmidt, S. N. L., Hass, J., Kirsch, P., & Mier, D. (2021). The human mirror neuron system—A common neural basis for social cognition? Psychophysiology, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13781
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., Levkovitz, Y. (2010). The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex, 46(5), 668–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.008
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of Empathy Deficits following Prefrontal Brain Damage: The Role of the Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321593063
Tabullo, A. J., Navas Jiménez, V. A., & García, C. S. (2018). Associations between fiction reading, trait empathy and theory of mind ability. International journal of psychology and psychological therapy, 18(3), 357-370. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6579027.pdf
Taiwo, Z., Bezdek, M., Mirabito, G., & Light, S. N. (2021). Empathy for joy recruits a broader prefrontal network than empathy for sadness and is predicted by executive functioning. Neuropsychology, 35(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000666
Tan, L. B. G., Lo, B. C. Y., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Brief Mindfulness Meditation Improves Mental State Attribution and Empathizing. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e110510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110510
Tholen, M. G., Trautwein, F., Böckler, A., Singer, T., & Kanske, P. (2020). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) item analysis of empathy and theory of mind. Human Brain Mapping, 41(10), 2611–2628. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24966
Tusche, A., Böckler, A., Kanske, P., Trautwein, F. M., & Singer, T. (2016). Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(17), 4719–4732. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3392-15.2016
Valk, S. L., Bernhardt, B. C., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F. M., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2017). Socio-Cognitive Phenotypes Differentially Modulate Large-Scale Structural Covariance Networks. Cerebral Cortex, bhv319. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv319
Wang, Y., Liu, W. H., Li, Z., Wei, X. H., Jiang, X. Q., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K., Cheung, E. F. C., & Chan, R. C. K. (2015). Dimensional schizotypy and social cognition: an fMRI imaging study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 00133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00133
Wu, W., Sheppard, E., & Mitchell, P. (2016). Being Sherlock Holmes: Can we sense empathy from a brief sample of behaviour? British Journal of Psychology, 107(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12157














